Showing posts with label demand. Show all posts
Showing posts with label demand. Show all posts

2018-06-19

Bitcoin & Cryptocurrencies - Looking Beyond The Hype (BIS video)

Cryptocurrencies: looking beyond the hype


The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) (domain: BIS.org) video above published Jun 17, 2018: Hyun Song Shin speaks about Chapter V of the Annual Economic Report 2018 (full embed below). Cryptocurrencies' decentralized model of generating trust limits their potential to replace conventional money, the chapter argues.

Abstract: "Cryptocurrencies promise to replace trusted institutions with distributed ledger technology. Yet, looking beyond the hype, it is hard to identify a specific economic problem which they currently solve. Transactions are slow and costly, prone to congestion, and cannot scale with demand. The decentralized consensus behind the technology is also fragile and consumes vast amounts of energy. Still, distributed ledger technology could have promise in other applications. Policy responses need to prevent abuses while allowing further experimentation."

Cryptocurrencies: looking beyond the hype: BIS Annual Economic Report  |  17 June 2018, PDF full text (452kb)  |  24 pages embed below:

The Bank for International Settlements, founded May 17, 1930, is an international financial institution owned by 60 of the world's central banks which "fosters international monetary and financial cooperation and serves as a bank for central banks." The BIS provides banking services, but only to central banks and other international organizations. It is based in Basel, Switzerland, with representative offices in Hong Kong and Mexico City.

See also: The bigger Cryptocurrencies get, the worse they perform: BIS | Reuters.com.

feedback & comments via twitter @DomainMondo


DISCLAIMER

2017-08-22

Explaining Swings in Bitcoin’s Price, Cryptocurrency Primer (video)

Explaining the Swings in Bitcoin’s Price I Fortune

Video published Aug 17, 2017, by Fortune.com: Bitcoin has been on a tear since the start of 2017. But according to Fortune’s Jen Wieczner, the cryptocurrency is due for a downturn. Supply and Demand, Hype and Scarcity.

A Primer on Cryptocurrency

Video above published Aug 17, 2017, by L2inc.com: By popular demand, Scott Galloway and Aswath Damodaran discuss topics in cryptocurrency, from why it's impossible to value, to why people choose Bitcoin over gold.

0:01  The number one requested topic among users of Winners and Losers is:
0:07  cryptocurrencies.
0:08  Aswath, tell us more about cryptocurrencies and how you price and/or value them.
0:13  The first thing is you cannot value currency. You can price them.
0:16  Real quick - difference between value and pricing.
0:21  The difference between value and pricing is value you try to estimate what you get as cashflow.
0:25  So when you value a business you project out what the business will generate as cash flow.
0:28  So you can value cash flow generating assets.
0:31  But gold, currencies, Bitcoin are not cash flow generating assets.
0:35  You ask me what the value of gold is.
0:37  I don't know but I can price gold and we price currencies relative to each other.
0:41  And that's, I think, the opening to think about cryptocurrencies and why they've risen so much over the last few years.
0:48  If you think about gold,
0:49  let's think about gold - the alternative to paper currencies for hundreds of years.
0:55  When people lost trust in paper currency because all you have is a piece of paper,
1:00  it's all based on trust.
1:02  Doesn't every fiat currency eventually collapse throughout history
1:05  Fiat currencies vary widely.
1:08  In France if you gave me a Venezuelan Bolivar I'm probably better off just using it as toilet paper than trying to spend it.
1:12  So when we talk about fiat currencies not all fiats are equally trustworthy.
1:17  So when we lose trust in currencies, we go elsewhere.
1:21  For the longest time the place we went was gold.
1:24  I think what's changed is for younger people the place they go when they don't trust paper currencies is now cryptocurrency.
1:31  But help me - I understand, theoretically as an old guy
1:36  you go to gold and it can be used for fillings or jewelry.
1:39  What is the underlying guarantee and limit of a cryptocurrency?
1:44  Let's face it, the people who bought gold didn't want to use it,
1:48  they wanted to sell it to somebody else at a higher price.
1:50  It's a pure pricing game. The reason people have historically bought gold is not because they think gold has a physical use
1:57  but because they think it'll have enough of a pricing attached to it that they can sell it to somebody at a higher price.
2:03  So it's the illusion that it's become a store of value.
2:05  Exactly.
2:06  Okay so help me price Bitcoin and Ethereum.
2:10  I think the key to think about is if you have enough of the population losing trust
2:15  because we lost trust in governments and central banks and who can blame people for losing trust in them
2:20  and if you're 35, 30 or 25, you have no interest in pricing gold and playing the gold game,
2:27  you actually think you have an inside track on playing the pricing game with Bitcoin
2:32  and one of the things that always strikes me when I talk to people in this space
2:37  who are cryptocurrency fanatics is they think they know more than they do.
2:41  They think they understand everything about block chains and who
2:44  owns what and where the pricing is going and that's always a piece of the pricing game:
2:48  people who are overconfident about the capacity to forecast price.
2:53  We don't need very many people for the pricing to kind of do what it's done
2:56  which is if four or five percent of the population has lost trust and is paranoid.
3:00  So Trump is the best thing to happen for cryptocurrencies.
3:05  Collectively, globally. You could argue that governments across the globe...
3:12  It's I think a problem.
3:13  So you think in any sort of crisis, more missile tests coming out of North Korea, cryptocurrencies similar to gold go up, people stick cryptocurrencies under the mattress.
3:22  In fact one of the most interesting things about this bull market is it's a very differentiated market.
3:27  Half the market thinks that everything is cheap,
3:30  the other half thinks everything is increased.
3:33  I've never seen a divide as large as I have in the market that we're in
3:36  which is between the Bulls and the Bears.
3:38  There's almost no connecting point and it's very political. It's more political than economic.
3:44  Tell me who you voted for in the last election, I can tell you whether you're bullish or bearish.
3:48  That's how much of a correlation there is between politics and what you think about the market now.
3:53  which is not a healthy place to be.
3:56  So I think that even though markets have been going up,
3:59  the subset of people who think that markets are overpriced is a fairly large one and it's very intense
4:04  and they believe this for three, four, five years and that's the group that's increasingly leaving stocks
4:11  and they're saying well I can't go to bonds, I'm getting 2%,
4:14  what am I going to put my money in where I can make some money in the future?
4:18  A 25 year old has a hundred bucks. Mock portfolio - just create an asset allocation for me and a 55 year old.
4:25  The tool is very simple: you want to spread your bets.
4:27  Time is your ally.
4:29  So the 25 year old, don't try to time the market, don't tell me the markets you know, too high, too low, it doesn't matter.
4:36  You've got 40 years to play this game, just take your money, make your asset allocation.
4:42  So you want a portfolio that looks like this.
4:45  If I took the market cap of every traded asset in the world put in a pie chart
4:48  I want the pie chart of your portfolio to look very much like that.
4:53  Diversification and low cost.
4:55  Exactly.
4:55  55 year old.
4:57  55 year old you gotta worry more about this,
4:59  especially about the fact that if you have a shock to the market you might not be able to make that money back before you need it for retirement.
5:06  So 55 you know, the first question I would ask is hey do you still have an income?
5:11  If you're already retired at 55 the kind of advice I'm going to give you is going to be very different
5:15  than you give a 55 year old with an income stream still coming from working
5:18  because let's face it, a lot of 55 year olds have 15 years of work life still left in them.
5:24  So I think that you've got to get more cautious,
5:27  but the old know once you get to be 65 everything's got to be in cash.
5:31  You got to rethink because a lot of 65 year olds are still making enough of an income
5:34  that they don't need to touch their portfolios yet.
5:37  So it really is a question of do you depend on your portfolio for your cash needs
5:41  and if the answer is yes
5:42  then I'm going to increasingly shift your weight from any kind of risky asset class
5:46  because there is no safe place in the world where you can put your money in, make an 8% return and still draw cash every year
5:53  and not worry about your principal being affected.
5:55  Thanks very much, Professor Aswath Damodaran.
5:58  And more information at Damodaran.com.

See also: The ABCs of BITCOIN .... James Altucher | LinkedIn.com

feedback & comments via twitter @DomainMondo


DISCLAIMER

2015-02-14

Barry Ritholtz Interviews Westwood Capital Investment Banker Dan Alpert



Barry Ritholtz interviews investment banker Dan Alpert, founder and managing partner of Westwood Capital. Alpert is the author of “The Age of Oversupply: Overcoming the Greatest Challenge to the Global Economy.”

domain name: westwoodcapital.com

Domain Mondo note: For entrepreneurs and start-ups the interview becomes interesting @17:30--the global economy and its implications, China, oversupply, demand.... 

Alpert created the first collateralized debt obligations backed by commercial mortgage-backed securities, and one of the very first real-estate investment trusts. Over the past 30 years working in finance, he has developed expertise in distressed assets, structured products and real-estate financing.

2014-11-23

HTML5, Mobile Web, Google, Apple, and Domain Names

Domain Mondo: Are Domain Names Dinosaurs?".... domain names altogether are increasingly irrelevant. Need a web page? Facebook or Google or Amazon or Tumblr or Twitter or LinkedIn or Pinterest (and many, many others) will gladly provide you a web page with its own distinct URL, on an easy to use platform with lots of traffic, accessible on any device, including mobile devices through a native app, all for free! So the real competition for new gTLDS are Facebook et al, and apps--a "Billion-Dollar Trend" that alone is a major domain name killer..."
Is there any hope for the mobile web or are we doomed to a world of native apps on mobile devices? There is hope--the new OS is the browser, and virtually all new software is moving to the cloud:

 On HTML5 and the Group That Rules the Web: "[HTML5].... made it possible to load in new data without refreshing the browser​—in the form of “web apps” like Google Maps, Gmail, Twitter, and Facebook​.... We still call Web pages “pages,” but many of them are actually software applications—“apps”—as complex to engineer as any word processor or video game. (Often, they are word processors, such as Google Docs, or video games, such as HexGL.)...."

And from the ReadWrite interview of Tom Dale:

What will make the Web a first-class citizen on mobile devices? What needs to happen, and who is most likely to make it happen? "I think the competition between Google and Apple will make it happen. As I mentioned before, Google has a very strong incentive to keep users on the Web, as search ads continue to be their lifeblood... Expect to see a much tighter integration of Chrome (and, therefore, Web technologies) into Android over the coming years... As for Apple... I'm cautiously optimistic about the future of Safari on iOS. In particular, the work they've been doing on JavaScript performance is just stunning..."

However, saying that the mobile web is not dead, is NOT the same as saying there is (or even ever was) a need for the new gTLDs--new generic Top-Level domains--this is not 2005--today, internet traffic is moving to mobile devices where platforms such as Alibaba and Amazon and Facebook dominate and provide users with the ability to publish a web page (without buying a domain name) AND a native or web app for distribution of that web page to the internet. Most people on mobile devices are using only a handful of apps the majority of time. For those people and businesses who have an actual need for a domain name, most are choosing, and will continue to choose, a domain name in the trusted, high-traffic, domain name extensions of .COM and well-run ccTLDs (see also full list of ccTLDs).

ICANN has admitted it never considered "demand" as a relevant factor in deciding whether and how many new gTLD domains to delegate into the root. ICANN policy was to delegate as many new gTLDs as there were applicants who could pay $185,000 and withstand ICANN's application process. ICANN said consumers would pick the winners and losers among new gTLDs, meaning, presumably, all the new gTLDs might fail. ICANN never understood the difference between healthy competition and destructive competition and all the negative consequences which result. ICANN just saw the opportunity to make a lot of money in the short term, and beyond that never fully considered all the unintended consequences of its own foolish and irresponsible program.




2014-10-03

Reason #2 Why New gTLD Domains Are a #FAIL

Second part of the post from yesterday --

Reason #2 new gTLD domains are a #FAIL: Increasing Supply Does Not Increase Demand

New gTLDS are to Domains what Atlantic City is to Gambling--

What happened in Atlantic City, is already happening to the new gTLDs (new generic Top-Level Domains)--see Most New gTLD Domain Names Are On Life-Support, Infecting Other gTLDs. ICANN is flooding the domain name ecosystem with over 1300 new gTLDs (from just 22)--creating market chaos, confusion, and gross oversupply. New gTLD registries had to pay an initial fee of $185,000, plus other costs, and auction fees, which in many cases total in the millions of dollars ($US) invested before the first domain name is sold!

Here's what happened in Atlantic City--"... Everyone bought into the myth that gambling would bring in needed tax revenue, and that you could attract plenty of blackjack and slot machine players no matter how many casinos you built. But the demand was not infinite, and ultimately got divided among all these sites, hurting Atlantic City perhaps the most. How did city and state leaders react? By unveiling a plan to turn Atlantic City into Las Vegas. Somehow, their response to a glut of gambling was to add more gambling, only with lots of flash and nightclubs and fine dining. Revel, the linchpin of this strategy... racked up almost $1 billion in debt during the construction phase, straining the budget right from the beginning. Revel never made a dime, and flamed out just two years after its opening...." (source)

Sound familiar? Everyone at ICANN bought into the myth that more gTLDs would bring in more registrant fees, no matter how many new gTLDs were flooded into the domain name ecosystem.

Donald Trump on Atlantic City (Bloomberg video, August 11, 2014):

Donald Trump on what happened to Atlantic City--"Too much competition"-- tremendous competition eating away at itself --Trump talks to Bloomberg's Trish Regan

Atlantic City Politicians = ICANN
Atlantic City Casinos = new gTLDs' registry operators
Atlantic City Gamblers = new gTLDs' domain name registrants

Lessons learned:
  1. Demand is NOT infinite. 
  2. Increasing supply does NOT increase demand. 
  3. Too much competition is a BAD thing.



see also: ICANN, New gTLD Domain Names, Universal Acceptance Another #FAIL

2014-09-25

CentralNic Reports Loss, Admits New gTLDs Demand Has Fallen Short

This is becoming a pattern--now another new gTLD registry, CentralNic, not looking so good, financially--a big loss being reported (in contrast to a profit a year ago) in their most recent financials--

UPDATE - CentralNic confident of upsurge once super-brand domains launch - Proactiveinvestors (UK): "Chairman John Swingewood admitted that demand levels for the new TLDs has thus far fallen short of industry expectations"

But not to worry--somehow they are betting on .google???--

Chief executive Ben Crawford: "Some high profile launches, including so-called super-brand domains such as .google, .apple., .sony and .hsbc, have yet to take place and when they go live next year interest in gTLDs is likely to go through the roof, Crawford reckons." (source supra, emphasis added)

Oh sure, that's going to make the other unwanted, unneeded new gTLDs all of a sudden, be in demand. Ben, it's called denial and delusion and you got a bad case of it.

Wonder why he didn't mention Facebook.com, Amazon.com, and the other 114,000,000+ .COM domain names?

You can read all about it here.

Caveat Emptor!





Domain Mondo archive