Showing posts with label Stanford GSB. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Stanford GSB. Show all posts

2018-12-07

Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi Interview at Stanford GSB (video)

Dara Khosrowshahi, Uber CEO

Stanford Graduate School of Business (gsb.stanford.edu) video above published Dec 3, 2018: “People often optimize for the role or for the company. The first thing I optimize for is who I will work with. Don’t bet on companies, bet on people,” Dara Khosrowshahi, CEO of Uber, told students in this View From The Top event. Khosrowshahi discussed his departure from Expedia (expedia.com) and his approach to shifting company values at Uber (uber.com) to focus on diversity and inclusion. “An important factor in our change was setting a new culture and new norms,” he said. “We crowdsourced those norms and asked people – what kind of company do we want to be?”

Khosroshahi advised students to let go of benchmarking via titles and salaries when it comes to career goals. “Have a theme but don’t get locked in. I’m always looking around to make sure my own biases don’t prevent me from seeing something great,” he said. “When you’re lucky enough to take that risk, jump!” Khosrowshahi was interviewed by Lepi Jha Fishman, Stanford GSB MBA ’19.


feedback & comments via twitter @DomainMondo


DISCLAIMER

2018-01-01

Stanford GSB's Margaret Neale on Negotiation: Getting What You Want

Margaret Neale: Negotiating (more of) What You Want Anywhere with Anyone – Part 1

Margaret Neale explains why getting more of what you want in any negotiation usually means thinking about about what your counterpart wants first. Stanford Graduate School of Business video above (part 1) and below (part 2) published Jan 7, 2015.

Margaret Neale: Negotiating (more of) What You Want Anywhere with Anyone – Part 2

Margaret Neale answers common questions about how to craft a successful negotiation strategy, such as whether you should make the first offer, and how to know when you should walk away from a deal. Neale is the Adams Distinguished Professor of Management at Stanford Graduate School of Business, where her research focuses on negotiation and team performance.

Margaret Neale: Negotiation: Getting What You Want

Negotiation is problem solving. The goal is not to get a deal; the goal is to get a good deal. Four steps to achieving a successful negotiation:
  1. assess
  2. prepare
  3. ask
  4. package
Women increase the chance of a success when a proposal is framed in terms of benefits to your counterparts, team, or organization. Three questions to prepare women to enter a negotiation:
  1. Why are you asking? 
  2. How are you asking? 
  3. For whom are you asking?
Margaret Neale's research focuses primarily on negotiation and team performance. Her work applies judgment and decision-making research from cognitive psychology to the field of negotiation. Neale is the Adams Distinguished Professor of Management at Stanford Graduate School of Business. She has her BS in pharmacy from Northeast Louisiana University, her MS from the Medical College of Virginia and Virginia Commonwealth University and her PhD in Business Administration from the University of Texas. Stanford Graduate School of Business video above originally published Mar 13, 2013.

Transcript auto-generated via YouTube.com:


feedback & comments via twitter @DomainMondo


DISCLAIMER

2017-11-24

Advertising and Offline Retail: A Better Way to Track Shoppers (video)

A Better Way to Track Shoppers Offline

Stanford Graduate School of Business video above published Oct 9, 2017: Stephan Seiler, Associate Professor of Marketing, Stanford Graduate School of Business

YouTube.com auto-generated transcript (w/ minor edits):
00:00  [Music]
00:18  off-line compared to online retail is
00:20  still actually a very large fraction of
00:22  consumer spending so although online is
00:24  growing quite dramatically as of now
00:27  essentially still about 90 percent of
00:29  total retail spending happens in the
00:31  offline world and firms are still trying
00:33  to figure out how to best promote
00:35  products how to best run a price
00:37  promotions things of that sort and so we
00:40  wanted to go back and see can we
00:42  actually use tools that we learned about
00:45  it in the online world better types of
00:47  measurement and can we bring that back
00:48  through your flying world and try to
00:50  track things better so we know if I run
00:57  an ad online
00:58  I typically can track did somebody click
01:00  on it did it again to go to my website
01:01  how much they spend all this linkage is
01:04  much closer and those are often things
01:06  that we don't observe in the offline
01:07  world right so an online retailer would
01:09  know how did this consumer get to the
01:12  product you're ultimately purchased we
01:13  can observe browsing with a lot of
01:15  precision. Offline does usually no
01:17  equivalent traditionally we weren't able
01:18  to see how did somebody walk through the
01:20  store how did they actually get to the
01:22  specific aisle where they then picked up
01:23  products and so what we do in the study
01:26  is we actually bring in a new
01:28  measurement tool that's going to mimic
01:30  the way we're gonna observe things
01:31  online in the offline world and in
01:33  particular what we're going to do is
01:34  we're gonna rig consumer shopping carts
01:37  if you will with so-called radio
01:38  frequency identification tags which
01:40  worked like a GPS tracker that allow us
01:42  to track exactly how does somebody walk
01:44  through the store which category is
01:46  godigo? do they walk past what do they
01:48  eventually end up purchasing
01:50  [Music]
01:54  if in a particular week the supermarket
01:57  is running a beer ad do more people buy
02:00  a beer
02:00  that we were usually able to observe
02:02  even before but now we can also see did
02:04  actually more people go to the beer
02:06  aisle so did did that advertising
02:09  attract people to go to different part
02:11  was started they wouldn't have otherwise
02:12  gone to and then they made the purchase
02:14  if that's true then maybe this
02:16  advertising will have positive spillover
02:18  to other categories maybe people on
02:20  their way to the beer aisle are now
02:21  gonna pick up salty snacks other things
02:24  and so there's sort of anecdotally a lot
02:26  of that sense that we are gonna get
02:29  these kind of spillover effect so people
02:31  often talk about the fact that milk gets
02:33  stored in the back of the store
02:34  why because people buy it very
02:36  frequently and having it in the back of
02:38  the store makes them walk past a lot of
02:40  other categories and hence they might
02:42  pick up other things that they didn't
02:43  plan on buying on their way and so you
02:46  could imagine that advertising does
02:48  something very similar if advertising
02:49  allows me to divert traffic to other
02:51  parts of the store then maybe products I
02:54  pass on that way also gonna end up in my
02:56  purchase basket and so that was
02:59  something that we weren't usually able
03:00  to observe
03:01  [Music]
03:05  so for a store manager the good news
03:08  here is that advertising is quite
03:10  effective beyond just individual product
03:12  being advertised so what we find is that
03:14  when you advertise a particular brand of
03:16  beer sales go up in the beer category as
03:18  a whole and that increase comes partly
03:20  from the advertised brands but also goes
03:22  beyond that
03:23  so some consumers presumably just pick
03:26  up on effect beers being advertised
03:27  today they got reminded of I want to buy
03:30  beer and hence we seen increase in beer
03:31  sales and that's beyond the individual
03:34  product being advertised at the same
03:36  time we also find that the effect stops
03:38  there so to the extent that stores might
03:40  have to hope that driving more people to
03:43  the beer aisle through advertising will
03:45  then spill over into higher sales for
03:46  salty snacks or other categories that
03:49  are stocked nearby we find no evidence
03:51  for that whatsoever so we think so
03:53  things stop at the category level but
03:56  they go beyond individual product being
03:57  advertised and so hence as we think
04:00  about allocating advertising budget
04:02  thinking about effectiveness at the
04:04  level of the category rather than the
04:06  more narrow product level or the broader
04:08  store level seems to be the right way to
04:09  tackle that managerial decision
04:12  [Music]

feedback & comments via twitter @DomainMondo


DISCLAIMER

2017-11-16

Jamie Dimon, Chairman, President & CEO of JPMorgan Chase $JPM

Jamie Dimon, Chairman, President, and CEO of JPMorgan Chase

Stanford Graduate School of Business video above published Nov 9, 2017: Jamie Dimon, the Chairman, President, and CEO of JP Morgan Chase, at the inaugural session of the 2017 - 2018 View From The Top speaker series at Stanford GSB. Dimon discusses topics ranging from the dangers of bureaucracy to the validity of Bitcoin, to how dangerous a temper can be in the business world.

When asked how he ensures a fair and equal workplace, he said, “When you have an environment of trust and respect, people can shine. Go out of your way to make everyone accepted and you’ll build a great company."

Stock exchange: symbol  |  NYSE: JPM
 $JPM


feedback & comments via twitter @DomainMondo


DISCLAIMER

2017-01-27

Inside Sports Management, Stanford GSB Video

Inside Sports Management:

How executives make the tough calls in a demanding industry. Video published Nov 14, 2016 by Stanford Graduate School of Business (Stanford GSB), domain: gsb.stanford.edu.

YouTube Auto-generated Transcript (pdf):



feedback & comments via twitter @DomainMondo


DISCLAIMER

2016-11-03

Stanford GSB Professor David Brady: A Look at the 2016 Elections (video)

"As for Mainstream Media [MSM] bias: Bernie [Sanders] was fortunate to only be blacked out, Soviet style; Trump has zero MSM newspaper endorsements and has been subjected to MSM bias that is laughably ham-handed, reminiscent of old-style Communist "running dogs of Imperialism" propaganda ... With the rise of the Internet and social media, broadcast propaganda is now competing with narrowcast: blogs, Twitter and Facebook enable self-organizing tacit tribes ... with their own networks of communication, narratives and agendas ... In terms of finance and communications, politics as usual--political candidates and narratives mandated by the parties' Ruling Elites and the MSM--is dead. We will all look back in 2026 and wonder why the recognition of this reality took so long."--Charles Hugh Smith
David Brady: A Look at the 2016 Elections:

Whatever your political leanings or anxieties about this year's Presidential election, you will be enlightened after listening to Professor Brady's talk in the video above. He explains what, in his view, is really happening, what makes this election year different than others, not just in the U.S., but in Europe and elsewhere, with humor and insight. 

One caveat: much has already changed (or been revealed) since the video above was recorded on October 14, 2016, as part of the Stanford University Graduate School of Business (Stanford GSB) Fall Reunion/Alumni Weekend.

Topics covered include globalization and immigration. The 2016 Presidential Race has had a polarizing effect on many voters, with the 2 major candidates each having high unfavorable ratings. See, e.g., Clinton’s unfavorable rating hits new high in poll | Trump targets Democratic states in final sprint | MarketWatch.com (Oct. 31, 2016).

New polling indicates voters are shifting in view of the late-breaking Wikileaks disclosures, the FBI re-opening its investigation of Hillary Clinton (email scandal) together with revelations about the Clinton Foundation and its tie-ins ("pay-to-play") with Teneo and Hillary Clinton during her tenure as Secretary of State. Trump 47.8% now leads Clinton 42.4% in the USC Dornsife / LATimes.com tracking poll as of November 2, 2016.

The YouGov.com poll referenced in Professor Brady's talk, as of November 1, 2016, shows Trump has a clear path to victory (270 electoral votes) by winning YouGov's "toss-up" states of Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, Iowa, Ohio, Nevada, and Pennsylvania (in all of which Trump narrowly leads or is close according to YouGov). Even without Pennsylvania, Trump could still win by picking up another 10 electoral votes somewhere else, such as Wisconsin. One BIG problem with the YouGov methodology is that it estimates patterns of 2016 voter turnout using the 2012 Obama-Romney general election--which YouGov admits is "a key place where we might get things wrong if there is a large change in turnout patterns" in 2016--many experts say 2016 voter turnout patterns will differ from 2012. See also The U.S. Stock Market Isn’t Going Clinton’s Way | Bloomberg.com Nov. 1, 2016: "S&P 500 down 3.2% since Aug. 8, a good sign for challenger Trump. Market correctly signals outcome 86 percent of time since 1928." 

Just as the Brexit vote was the global macroeconomic event of the first half of 2016, the U.S. Presidential election has the potential to be the global macroeconomic event of the second half of 2016. U.S. voting will conclude the evening of Tuesday, November 8.

Speaker in the video: David Brady
Professor of Political Economy, Stanford GSB 
Davies Family Senior Fellow, Hoover Institution 
Senior Fellow, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research

Stanford Graduate School of Business, Stanford University
Domain: gsb.stanford.edu

See also:
Unedited auto-generated YouTube.com transcript (pdf) embedded below:




feedback & comments via twitter @DomainMondo


DISCLAIMER

Domain Mondo archive