Showing posts with label generic. Show all posts
Showing posts with label generic. Show all posts

2017-08-15

iPhone Generation: Lonely & Depressed Losers? (video)

iPhone Generation: Lonely & Depressed

Video above published Aug 10, 2017 by L2inc.com--NYU Stern Professor Scott Galloway on digital winners and losers--

Loser: Unsustainable internet companies. Pureplays like Wayfair (domain: wayfair.com) and Blue Apron (domain: blueapron.com) are getting Amazon-like valuations without a critical component: a business that works.

Loser: The brand-industrial complex. Startup Brandless (domain: brandless.com) sells generic household items for $3 each, pointing to a larger shift in consumer behavior.

Loser: The smartphone generation. Three-quarters of American teens own iPhones (domain: apple.com/iphone), and the devices are making them more lonely -- but also less likely to do drugs.

Select slides:

Sources:
(0:13) “Meal-Kit Maker Blue Apron Goes Public, Demand Underwhelms As Amazon Looms,” Reuters, June 2017. http://reut.rs/2toDqYV
(0:13) “Pioneering Beauty Startup Birchbox Turns Profit After Tough 2016,” Forbes, April 2017. http://bit.ly/2fvh96f
(0:13) Google Finance, August 8, 2017.
(0:25) “New Amazon Data From Wall Street Should Terrify All Retail Stores In The US,” Business Insider, September 2016. http://read.bi/2bX6tG6
(0:30) “How Many Americans Are Amazon Prime Members?” The Motley Fool, April 2017. http://bit.ly/2fuXqmU
(0:30) “Share Of Internet Users In The United States Who Live In A Household With An Amazon Prime Subscription As Of November 2016,” Statista, November 2016. http://bit.ly/2vn3eob
(0:30) “Sixty-Four Percent Of U.S. Households Have Amazon Prime,” Forbes, June 2017. http://bit.ly/2usxrU8
(0:38) Value Investors Club, April 2016.
(0:43) L2 Analysis Of SEMRush Data, June 2017.
(0:47) “AMZN Cash Reserves,” Quandl, June 2017. http://bit.ly/2vIetIY
(0:53) “Burning Cash And Losing Customers, Wayfair Is Running Out Of Options,” Seeking Alpha, May 2017. http://bit.ly/2rqZ5dJ
(1:00) L2 Analysis of iSpotTV Data.
(1:12) L2 Analysis Of SEMRush Data, June 2017.
(1:31) “Blue Apron Significantly Lowers Its Valuation With Slashed IPO Pricing,” techcrunch, June 2017. http://tcrn.ch/2t1AIG0
(1:37) “Blue Apron Is Spending More Than $400 For Every New Customer — And That's Creating A Major Problem For The Company,” Business Insider, August 2017. http://read.bi/2vIHeVL
(1:45) “Form S-1,” Blue Apron Holdings, Inc., June 2017. http://bit.ly/2qGf2No
(1:50) “Blue Apron Vs. HelloFresh: A Look At Multiples And Valuation History,” CB Insights, June 2017. http://bit.ly/2uK03Dl
(1:50) “Blue Apron: 5 Things To Know About The Meal-Kit Delivery Company,” Market Watch, July 2017. http://on.mktw.net/2rtG3VH
(2:51) Cadent Consulting Group, 2016.
(3:42) “Have Smartphones Destroyed a Generation?” The Atlantic, September 2017. http://theatln.tc/2u3JDX6
(3:42) “Millennials Surpass Gen Xers as the Largest Generation in U.S. Labor Force,” Pew Research Center, May 2015. http://pewrsr.ch/1KAFrQ0
(3:54) “2016 Overview Key Findings on Adolescent Drug Use,” Monitoring The Future, January 2017. http://bit.ly/1WumBiz

Transcript via YouTube.com:
0:00  A loser: unsustainable Internet companies. Wayfair, Blue Apron and Birchbox are the
0:08  latest that have no sustainable strategy. These peer players are getting Amazon
0:12  like valuations without a critical component. That is a business that works,
0:18  or some sort of moat, that makes their companies scalable. For example,
0:22  warehouses within 20 miles of 45% of the population, or an incredibly robust
0:28  loyalty program with 58% of American households- yes, we're talking about
0:32  Prime. Wayfair's on track to double William Sonoma's eCommerce sales by 2019. Selling
0:38  low-priced items, they're competing with Amazon, which bids on 43,000 of the same
0:44  keywords. However, Amazon's cash won't run out. Meanwhile, Wayfair spending is
0:49  unsustainable. The company currently has more liabilities than assets. In exchange
0:54  for that massive spend, it's garnered no customer loyalty, even though the company
0:58  spent 72 million dollars on TV ads in 2016, and is slated to spend 90
1:04  million this year. Just 9 percent of search traffic comes from the master
1:08  brand term, compared to 30 to 50 percent from Williams-Sonoma brands. And they're
1:13  losing 60% of their customer base each year. By the way, the best proxy for brand
1:18  equity: look at the percentage of traffic garnered from key term brand searches.
1:23  Millward Brown and Ipsos: those businesses are going away. Blue Apron has a similar
1:28  story. In Q1 they lost 52 million on revenue of 245 million. The company has
1:34  an enormous acquisition cost; it spent four hundred and sixty dollars for each
1:38  new customer in 2016. Despite all those new users, Blue Apron's
1:43  revenue growth has been flat since Q1 of 2015. Their IPO down round was likely
1:48  the nail in the coffin. What Wall Street doesn't get? Paying high cost of customer
1:53  acquisition and investing insane amounts in fulfillment doesn't work when you
1:58  have 60 percent customer churn. At some point, like we saw with flash sites, there
2:03  will be a major correction in the marketplace. My advice to these companies?
2:07  While the market is drunk and asleep, grab its wallet and buy a real business,
2:13  as it will wake up, and it will be sober and irritable. A continued loser: the
2:19  brand industrial complex. The new startup, Brandless, competes with Amazon by
2:23  borrowing another of the Seattle giant's strategies: Private Label. And more
2:27  accurately: no label. But then again, if Brandless becomes popular, isn't Brandless
2:31  a brand? Mind blown. Brandless sells generic household items
2:36  from toothpaste to olive oil for just three dollars: yet another signal of the
2:40  death of the industrial brand complex, and is indicative of what is happening
2:44  in the larger consumer economy. Normally during a recession private label brands
2:49  take a larger share of CPG sales, as people are trying to save money and
2:53  don't want to pay more for the better known brand. During the recovery, however,
2:57  big CPG brands are able to use the normal levers of traditional advertising
3:02  and caps etc., they convince consumers to pay up for the premium brand. But things
3:08  are different now. There's been a structural shift, and despite a
3:11  recovery in the economy, private label sales continue to grow. We have entered a
3:16  new era; the sun has passed midday on brand building. A loser: the smartphone
3:22  generation. Three in four American teens now owns an iPhone. The impact? It's
3:28  making them more lonely. The data is clear: since the release of the iPhone,
3:32  the world has changed for American teens. Among other things, just 56 percent of
3:37  high school seniors in 2015 went on dates in contrast 85 percent of
3:43  Boomers and Gen Xers. To be fair, it's not all bad news.
3:47  Teens may be replacing drugs with their iPhones. Usage of illicit drugs, other
3:52  than weed, has fallen among eighth, tenth, and twelfth graders, to its lowest point
3:57  in 40 years. So teens are lonely, single, and addicted
4:01  to their smartphones, but not doing drugs. Progress? Maybe. My sons are getting their
4:07  first smartphones, and I told them they could have any ringtone, as long as it
4:12  was the sound of a tree falling in the forest or one hand clapping. In addition,
4:16  my smartphone is broken. Every time I use the home button, I find I'm still with
4:21  people I hate.

feedback & comments via twitter @DomainMondo


DISCLAIMER

2016-03-12

Consumer Trust In New gTLD Domains Is Getting Worse says NCC Group

ICANN's new gTLDs--more bad news--

Consumers still not comfortable with new domains [Press Release] (emphasis and links added):

Over half of consumers (52%) express discomfort in visiting websites ending in new domains, according to new research from global cyber security and risk mitigation expert NCC Group.

This is an increase on last year (49%) and this state of unease is underlined further with just 2% of consumers claiming to be extremely comfortable visiting them.

The research, from the Group’s Trust in the Internet Study 2016, was carried out by IDG Research Services and questioned 10,000 consumers across the US and UK regarding their attitudes to new generic top-level domains (gTLDs).

ICANN – the organisation responsible for the management of the domain system – has been rolling out new domain endings since October 2014 [sic][since January 2014 (general availability)]. Following 1,930 applications, more than 900 are now live on the Internet, with users able to visit sites ending in the likes of .london or .ninja

Consumers were most comfortable with .brand domains such as .hsbc, while the generic .ninja was met with the most discomfort.

Rob Cotton, CEO at NCC Group, said: “Trust in the new domain endings is getting worse. This will put organisations off from moving on from legacy domains which is a problem for registries whose businesses hinge on selling them. If the new endings are to be successful they need to somehow establish a reputation of trustworthiness.

“.brand domains are faring the best when it comes to consumer perception, but there aren’t enough currently being used for this trend to continue. Doing nothing isn’t really an option as this comfort will erode though lack of use. For the generic domains the message is clear: you need to differentiate on more than just the name, otherwise consumers are very wary.”

There were some factors that increased confidence in new domains. 50% of consumers felt more confident if companies clearly communicated the steps taken to secure personal data, while 46% said a branded logo indicating the site was safe would boost confidence.

Cotton continued: “Security is clearly an important issue for consumers. While ‘secure’ logos have in the past proved to be nothing more than logos, the appetite for them from respondents shows that companies need to do more to show that the safeguarding of customer data is front of mind.”

“Security is going to play an increasing role in the fight for consumers online. Companies that prioritise it now – and see their domain strategy as part of their wider security strategy – will be the best positioned to win that fight.”

Source: NCC Group plc - "NCC Group is a global expert in cyber security and risk mitigation, working with businesses to protect their brand, value and reputation against the ever-evolving threat landscape. Through a unique range of services, the company helps businesses to prepare for and respond to cyber threats, providing freedom from doubt that their most important assets are protected and operational at all times. NCC Group is passionate about making the Internet safer and revolutionising the way in which organisations think about cyber security. Listed on the FTSE 250, NCC Group is a trusted advisor to more than 15,000 clients worldwide. Headquartered in Manchester, UK, with over 30 offices across the world, the Group employs over 1,800 people."






DISCLAIMER

2015-01-15

Addition of TLD .COM Can Make Trademark Distinctive says French Court

Addition of TLD .COM can make trademark distinctive says French Court--

"In B v Pressimmo On Line (October 14 2014), the Paris Court of Appeal has ruled that, while the term ‘se loger’ (meaning ‘to find somewhere to live’) on its own was descriptive in relation to real estate, it was distinctive when combined with the top-level domain (TLD) ‘.com’. The claimant was a group of companies (Pressimmo On Line and Se Loger.com)..." read more at: worldtrademarkreview.com (subscription)

Note the difference between descriptive and distinctive marks: Trademark distinctiveness - Wikipedia: "Trademark distinctiveness is an important concept in the law governing trademarks and service marks. A trademark may be eligible for registration, or registrable, if it performs the essential trademark function, and has distinctive character. Registrability can be understood as a continuum, with "inherently distinctive" marks at one end, "generic" and "descriptive" marks with no distinctive character at the other end, and "suggestive" and "arbitrary" marks lying between these two points. "Descriptive" marks must acquire distinctiveness through secondary meaning - consumers have come to recognize the mark as a source indicator - to be protectable. "Generic" terms are used to refer to the product or service itself and cannot be used as trademarks...."

See also the search results here and the following:

Showing Common-Law Trademark Rights in a UDRP: "... the UDRP is only designed to be used by a complainant who owns the rights to a trademark that has been infringed upon by a domain name. Typically, trademark rights are proven in UDRP complaints by showing the copy of a registration certificate in some country. Merely having a pending trademark application is not enough. However, it may be possible to meet this proof by showing evidence of common-law trademark rights, which arise from actual use rather than from a formal registration...."

Domain Mondo archive