Showing posts with label Ethics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ethics. Show all posts

2018-08-31

Microsoft Democratizing Artificial Intelligence (video)

Democratizing Artificial Intelligence (AI)

Brad Smith, Microsoft's president and chief legal officer, tells CNBC why the company is on a mission to democratize AI and the role of ethics in this new generation of computing. CNBC Life video above published Aug 30, 2018. See also: https://aidemos.microsoft.com/.

Microsoft AI
@zochats & @microsoft
Domain: zo.ai


feedback & comments via twitter @DomainMondo


DISCLAIMER

2017-11-26

News Review | ICANN Board Executive Committee, Conflicts of Interest

graphic "News Review" ©2016 DomainMondo.com
Domain Mondo's weekly internet domain news review (NR 2017-11-26) with analysis and opinion: Features •  1) ICANN Board Executive Committee, Conflicts of Interest, 2) ICANN news: a. ICANN61 Caravan, b. Public Comment Periods, c. 3 Peas in a Pod - ICANN is a "chummy private club"3) Names, Domains & Trademarks:  a. DOJ Antitrust - ICANN & Verisign $VRSN Next?, b. ccTLD .au, c. GoDaddy $GDDY, d. SteelyDan.com, e. .COM Brand Credibility, f. Worth Reading, g. Good Advice, 4) ICYMI: Internet Freedom, 5) Most Read.

1) Executive Committee of the ICANN Board of Directors, Conflicts of Interest:

Background:
"A boardroom dispute over ethics has broken out at the organization that maintains the Internet address system after its most important supporter, the United States government, reproached the group for governance standards said to fall short of “requirements requested by the global community.” The Commerce Department said this month that while it was temporarily extending a contract with the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers [ICANN] to manage the allocation of computers’ Internet protocol addresses ... it warned the organization that it needed to tighten its rules against conflicts of interest or risk losing a central role ... “ICANN must place commercial and financial interests in their appropriate context,” said Mr. [Rod] Beckstrom, who is scheduled to step down from his post [ICANN President & CEO] in July. “How can it do this if all top leadership is from the very domain-name industry it is supposed to coordinate independently? ..."--The New York Times March 18, 2012, under the title "Ethics Fight Over [new gTLDs] Domain Names Intensifies" (emphasis added).
"If one wanted to capture ICANN on a single issue, or a group of interrelated issues, the most practical tactic might be bribery" -- John C. Coffee Jr., Columbia University Professor of Law, IANA Transition advisor to the U.S. Department of Commerce (NTIA). See News Review [24Jul]: IANA Transition & ICANN Corruption, Capture, and Control.
photo graphic: Executive Committee of the ICANN Board of Directors (source: ICANN.org)
Executive Committee of the ICANN Board of Directors (source: ICANN.org)
ICANN Board Executive Committee "(A) To the extent permitted by law, the Committee shall exercise all the powers of the Board during the interval periods between regular Board meetings when the Board is unavailable or unable to meet. (B) The Committee shall not have the authority to adopt, amend or repeal any provision of the Bylaws or take any other action which has been reserved for action by the full Board pursuant to the Bylaws, a resolution of the Board or which the Committee is otherwise prohibited by law to take."--Executive Committee Charter | As approved by the Board of Directors on 2 November 2017.

Membership and Leadership of ICANN Board Committees | ICANN.org: "Executive CommitteeCherine Chalaby (Executive Committee Chair)[also ICANN Board Chair]; Becky BurrChris Disspain [ICANN Board Vice Chair]; Göran Marby [ICANN President & CEO]."
Becky Burr, a former U.S. government lawyer, is employed by privately-held Neustar, a domain name registry operator and backend registry services provider for hundreds of new gTLDs. Neustar also owns another backend registry services provider, which Burr failed to disclose in her SOI (see below), ARI Registry Services, which reportedly was involved in the secret conflict of interest which caused the resignation of Kurt Pritz, ICANN's Chief Strategy Officer "best known as the architect of ICANN's new gTLD program" in 2012. A complete list of the new gTLDs and new gTLD applicants for which Neustar or ARI Registry Services is the designated backend registry services provider is not readily available on the ICANN website, but ntldstats.com provides some information (via its listings) for delegated new gTLDs: Neustar (223 new gTLDs) and ARI Registry Services (58 new gTLDs). 
Burr's SOI (Statement of Interest)(June 2017):
"J. Beckwith Burr: Vice President and Deputy General Counsel for Neustar, Inc., which contract [sic] with ICANN to operates [sic] .Biz and .Neustar, and which provides back-end registry services for numerous other gTLDs under contract with ICANN."

[Editor's note: Burr not only failed to disclose Neustar's connection with ARI Registry Services, but also failed to mention pending new gTLD applicants for which either Neustar or ARI Registry Services may be providing services, now or in the future.]
Chris Disspain is the former CEO of .au Domain Administration Ltd. (auDA), which terminated his contract in 2016. A question relating to Disspain while at auDA may be involved in this Freedom of Information request, but that request, unfortunately, was refused by the Australian government. I say "unfortunately" because allegations relating to ccTLD .au, its administration and management, have been a continuing saga, and may have no basis in fact or nothing to do with Disspain as auDA CEO (see item at 3)b. below). On the other hand, it's possible some of allegations may be both relevant (to Disspain as auDA CEO) and true.
Disspain's SOI (June 2017):
"Chris Disspain: Until March 2016, was Director and CEO of .au Domain Administration Limited, the .au ccTLD manager; .au has sponsorship agreement with ICANN under which .au pays ICANN a yearly amount based on the amount of names under management. .au Domain Administration Limited licenses AusRegistry Pty Ltd to run the registry for the second level names in .au. Under the Registry License agreement, AusRegistry pays fees to .au Domain Administration Limited; companies affiliated with AusRegistry are affiliated with new gTLD applications and registry operators." (emphasis added)

[Editor's Note: AusRegistry is also owned by Neustar (acquired with ARI Registry Services and other subsidiaries of Bombora Technologies Pty Ltd. in July 2015), which Disspain failed to note in his SOI. Disspain's LinkedIn profile also states he is Chairman of the Board of WGP Global (Oct 2014 – Present) and CEO of DNS Capital Ltd (2017), neither of which are disclosed in his SOI.]

Marby's and Chalaby's SOIs state only: "Nothing identified."

[Editor's note: "Nothing identified" is a very inadequate SOI response by any Director of a nonprofit public benefit corporation such as ICANNaccountable to the global internet community, not just to ICANN's jurisdictional authorities, the U.S. government and State of California. "Nothing identified" is a purely subjective response, and gives stakeholders and other third parties, no information upon which they might alert the Director, ICANN organization, or ICANN community, of a possible conflict (of which the Director may not even be aware, e.g., in connection with a large enterprise). To avoid even the appearance of impropriety, at a minimum, all ICANN Director SOIs should state the present, recent, and prospective relationships or positions (if known), of each Director with any non-ICANN entity (see, for example, Steve Crocker's SOI), with more specificity as to any interest or connection to any entity that does, or may do, business with ICANN or any of its contracted parties, or any of their subcontractors or suppliers, including consulting or professional services. As a sidenote, I am alarmed by ICANN Director George Sadowsky's SOI disclosure: "also in discussions with registry operator(s) for potential independent contractor relationship, but nothing yet in place." Without knowing more, it's possible one or more registry operators may be trying to improperly influence an ICANN director by promising a future "independent contractor relationship"--see Professor Coffee's comment (first above) about capture of ICANN through bribery. It wasn't that long ago that the entire new gTLDs program was forever tainted, not only by an unethical ICANN Board of Directors (see first link above), or the resignation of ICANN CSO Kurt Pritz due to a secret conflict of interest as noted above, but also by the controversial resignation of ICANN Board Chairman Peter Dengate Thrush after a key vote on the new gTLDs program, followed by employment of that former Chairman by a new gTLDs applicant's parent company. The ICANN Board's Code of Conduct and Conflicts of Interest Policy (more info here) are in need of review and amendments.]
Interestingly, Burr and Disspain have not gone through the due diligence screening process (background checks) that the ICANN Nominating Committee (NomCom) utilizes for ICANN Board membership, but apparently both have recently volunteered to do so. 
[Editor's note: review of the above gives one an understanding of how ICANN--the Board, organization, and "ICANN community"--could have been so grossly negligent as to outsource "technical feasibility" testing of all new gTLDs [see RA §1.2 Technical Feasibility of String] to the new gTLDs' hucksters, i.e., the new gTLDs applicants, knowing (since at least 2003) that most new gTLDs would "fail to work as expected on the internetwhich was again recently confirmed (pdf). Anyone ever seen a new gTLD applicant's report on the technical feasibility of any of their new gTLDs? Most, if not all, of the hucksters didn't bother, "it's all about the money." No wonder some have called ICANN's new gTLDs program a global "consumer fraud" upon both registrants and end users, about which ICANN has done nothing to warn or educate consumers or otherwise make consumers "aware" of all the defects of new gTLDs--no one at ICANN wants to talk about this kind of "awareness program." "It's all about the money."  See also on Domain Mondo:
Hopefully the lax standards of ICANN and its Board of Directors, identified above and elsewhere, will be corrected before long.  Until then, members of the global internet community may rightfully ask, "When will ICANN be run like a nonprofit public benefit corporation accountable to the global internet community, instead of just a 'chummy private club' licensed by the State of California?" ]

"Those that cannot remember the past are doomed to repeat it."--George Santayana

2) ICANN news
graphic "ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers"
a. ICANN's 'Chummy Private Club' Caravan to ICANN61--CCWG-Accountability-WS2 Travel Funding for ICANN 61--If  ICANN didn't pay people to show up (including travel expenses, hotel, $60 per diem, $400 stipend), how many would bother to come? The people being paid to show up over and over again, are a small group of 'ICANN insiders' who (to paraphrase the words of former ICANN Board Chair Esther Dysonpretend to represent the global internet community. The "gravy train" reports are published here. (Note: ICANN60 reports unavailable.)

b. Public Comment Periods Closing in December 2017 | ICANN.org: at 23:59 UTC on the respective dates indicated below (subject to change):

c) 3 Peas in a Pod
Uniregistry's 3000% Frank Schilling, with his pals ICANN GDD President Akram Atallah and ICANN GDD VP Cyrus Namazi at ICANN60. ICANN is a "chummy private club."
 
3) Names, Domains & Trademarks
graphic "Names, Domains & Trademarks" ©2017 DomainMondo.com
a. Antitrust Enforcement: First AT&T, ICANN and Verisign $VRSN Next? 
"ICANN is just a scam and the entire industry is based on monopolistic fraud with DC payoffs."--Mike Mann, domain names registrant and domainer, March 30, 2017.
President Trump's new head of the U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division, Makan Delrahim, brings the Trump administration's first major antitrust enforcement action: AT&T, U.S. Prepare to Battle in Court Over Time Warner Merger | Bloomberg.com Nov 20, 2017: "The legal challenge ... [deals] a blow to a tie-up that appeared to be sailing toward approval as recently as a month ago. That was before Delrahim was appointed to his post. “This merger would greatly harm American consumers,” he [Delrahim] said Monday. “It would mean higher monthly television bills and fewer of the new, emerging innovative options that consumers are beginning to enjoy.”

[Editor's note: Maybe Delrahim can do something about monopolists ICANN and gTLD registry operators, which are shamelessly price-gouging consumers (registrants) in the United States and worldwide. For background, see this and this. See also: News Review | Global Public Interest: Why ICANN Will Always Be A #FAIL.]

b. ccTLD .au: Review of Australia’s .au domain management | Department of Communications and the Arts | gov.au"seeking feedback on the management of the .au domain to ensure it remains fit for purpose in serving the needs of Australians online."  Consultation Period: Nov 16, 2017 16:00 AEDT to Dec 18, 2017 17:00 AEDT. Review of Australia’s .au domain management - Discussion paper for Review of Australia’s .au domain management published 16th Nov 2017: Download PDF (393.02 KB). More info at the first link above, and at Lexology.com.

c. GoDaddy (NYSE:GDDY): Goldman Sachs has added GoDaddy to its hedge fund VIP list. Shares of the top five companies on that list--Facebook, Amazon, Alibaba, Google, and Microsoft--have outperformed the S&P 500 by 770 basis points this year--SeekingAlpha.com.

d. SteelyDan.com: Donald Fagen has sued Walter Becker's estate, alleging the Becker estate is improperly asserting control over the Steely Dan name, specifically, the band's website [domain: steelydan.com], which the estate currently operates, and that Becker's estate has not "relinquished or shared control of that domain name with Fagen" and "absent an injunction… will continue to misappropriate Steely Dan's website and otherwise inappropriately use the Steely Dan name.""--RollingStone.com.

e. How to make your brand look credible for overseas customers | startups.co.uk: 1. Get a .COM domain name. [Editor's note: the default TLD for business in the U.S., and globally, is .COM (and will continue to be for the foreseeable future despite all the misinformation coming from inept ICANN and its new gTLDs' "partners.") More info here.]

f. Worth Reading: The Big Issues in the Domain Industry - Part 2 | whizzbangsblog.com.

g. Good Advice: Only buy what (domains) you need | OnlineDomain.com.

4) ICYMI Internet Domain News 
graphic "ICYMI Internet Domain News" ©2017 DomainMondo.com
• Only 23% of the World Has a Free and Open Internet | Nextgov.com. [Editor's Note: soon to be far less than 23%--see next item below.]

• U.S.: Ajit Pai and the FCC want it to be legal for Comcast to block BitTorrent | TheVerge.com"Pai says his rules will “significantly reduce the likelihood” ISPs like Comcast will engage in behaviors that harm consumers. Not prevent, mind you, but reduce the chances. Such trust in market forces to work in a broadband market where 51 percent of Americans only have one choice of broadband provider! And if there is harmful behavior? Well, it won’t be so bad because at least we didn’t impose regulatory costs on Comcast and Verizon." [Editor's note: sounds like FCC Chair Ajit Pai is reading from the same playbook as inept ICANN. The sh*t hits the fan on December 14--Orwellian agenda item: "Restoring Internet Freedom."]

Pakistan: Study: Internet Freedom Worsens in Pakistan | VOAnews.com"Pakistan among the top four countries, including Brazil, Mexico and Syria, where people have been murdered in each of the last three years for writing about sensitive subjects online."

• China: Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC) Rejects Censorship Critics, Says Internet Must Be 'Orderly'--VOAnews.com.

U.S.: Defense Department Spied On Social Media, Left All Its Collected Data Exposed To Anyone | Techdirt.com: "I know that the US government still has this "collect it all" mentality, but as we've discussed over and over again, adding more hay to the haystack doesn't make it easier to find the needles."

5) The Four Most Read Posts (# of pageviews Sun-Sat) this past week on DomainMondo.com: 
graphic "Domain Mondo" ©2017 DomainMondo.com
1. News Review | Incompetent Lawyers, Domain Names & ICANN's UDRP

-- John Poole, Editor, Domain Mondo 

feedback & comments via twitter @DomainMondo


DISCLAIMER

2016-04-08

ICANN Sends Letter To US Senators But Does NOT Answer Questions

"The Board is not aware of any conflicts of interest relating to his [Fadi Chehade] activities during his tenure that would require additional steps to be taken in order to remain consistent with ICANN’s policies in effect relating to conflicts." --Steve Crocker, Chairman of the ICANN Board of Directors, April 6, 2016 Letter to U.S. Senators Cruz, Lee, Lankford--see embedded below-highlighting added:



What were the Questions the US Senators were seeking answers to? They were numerous, none of which were answered by Steve Crocker. See letter of April 4 embedded below:



Finally, in regard to Crocker's claim of no real or potential "conflicts of interest," this is a continuing, systemic problem within ICANN, that goes all the way to the top and formed the basis for the US Government threatening to pull the IANA contract away from ICANN in 2012:
The New York Times March 18, 2012: "A boardroom dispute over ethics has broken out at the organization that maintains the Internet address system after its most important supporter, the United States government, reproached the group for governance standards said to fall short of “requirements requested by the global community.”..." (emphasis added)
In fact, some members of the ICANN community recognized and agreed that Fadi Chehade's activities in China constituted a real or potential conflict of interest requiring referral to ICANN's Corporate Counsel in accordance with ICANN policy, but apparently every member of the ICANN Board of Directors failed to recognize, much less refer as required by ICANN policy, the matter--see transcript (pdf) of Non-Contracted Parties House, Intersessional Meeting  at ICANN, February 5, 2016, excerpts below:



Following which a long discussion occurred among ICANN stakeholders at the meeting, discussing whether to send a letter of inquiry to the Board to find out whether the Board had done anything in compliance with ICANN's conflicts of interest policy. Apparently the ICANN Board did not comply with ICANN's own conflicts of interest policy, nor even recognized a real or potential conflict of interest--just another failure of corporate governance inside of ICANN? 

At the very least, this is just another indication that the ICANN Board of Directors needs its own independent legal counsel--not ICANN's legal staff nor Jones Day--and obviously,  needs to be educated about "conflicts of interest."

Caveat Emptor!

See also: How ICANN and ICANN CEO Fadi Chehadé Evade Accountability | DomainMondo.com

and After Wuzhen, Should ICANN President & CEO Fadi Chehade Be Fired? | DomainMondo.com

and ICANN, Kurt Pritz, Conflict of Interest, new gTLD domain names program | DomainMondo.com




DISCLAIMER

2015-10-23

ICANN Lobbying, Conflicts, Ethics, Transparency, Accountability, Disclosure

The word "lobbying" was used 22 times yesterday at the ICANN 54 Public Forum in Dublin, Ireland--the first 3 times in the question asked via email by the editor of Domain Mondo. The next 10 times in interchanges between Kieren McCarthy and ICANN CEO Fadi Chehade. The video of the Public Forum and the transcript excerpts of the above are at the Domain Mondo post: ICANN 54 Public Forum Video, Q&A, ICANN, INTA, IANA, Lobbyists.

The final 9 uses of the word "lobbying" were by Rick Lane, Sr. Vice President Government Affairs at 21st Century Fox, and member of the ICANN Business Constituency, who spoke in response to Fadi's "give and take about lobbying" referenced above [Lane starts @03:34:46 on the livestream video here] (emphasis added)

Thank you. My name is Rick Lane I’m with 21st Century Fox. I wanted to respond to Fadi's give and take about lobbying and he's factually accurate which is there are definitions of what is lobbying. The Lobbying Disclosure Act [LDA] has a very narrow definition. And the money you report is very limited to your actual lobbying of Capitol Hill. Also requires that you lobby on -- you list what issues you have lobbied on. So the IANA transition. But then it's very broad in who you lobbied. House, Senate, NTIA, Department of Commerce. The next one that he showed was the tax form. Tax form is much broader. Includes grass-roots lobbying, so if you're trying to get other groups to join you and you're paying those groups. Also includes state lobbying.

The third one is the Foreign Agents Registration Act. That's the one that the U.S. uses where if you are representing a foreign government in front of the U.S. Congress or any agencies, you have to file with the Justice Department. The reason for that is that the Justice Department and Congress and American people want to know if there is undue influence by foreign governments on the U.S. Congress. Those filings are very detailed. They include who you met with, how much money you spent on expenditures, what you talked about, and I think that's what this community is more looking for. Not the LDA or your -- your tax because those are just dollar amounts. They're not really meaningful. What's really meaningful is what were the issues discussed? What were the resources? And the other important thing to know is those filings are only U.S. centric. And ICANN has told us over and over they are about the world. And we like that. So if you're only filing about what you're doing in the U.S., what about meetings in China, Brazil, Argentina? Anyplace else in the world that doesn't have by their federal laws the requirements to register lobbyists or require those expenditures.

So I think what we're asking and the B.C. asked this in its recent filing [timer sounds ] that we want to add an additional bylaw that requires ICANN or any individual acting on ICANN's behalf to make periodic public disclosures of their contacts with any government official as well as activities, receipts, and disbursements in support of those activities. Disclosure of those would enable the entire community to evaluate the statements and activities of such persons in their role as representing ICANN and in fact the ICANN community. So the answers were very narrow that Fadi gave about U.S. lobbying law, which I'm in charge of our lobbying ethics and lobbying filings so I know them very well. But we're talking very broad.

Wolfgang Kleinwachter: I think your point is clear and Steve [Crocker, ICANN Board Chairman] will react.

Steve Crocker: Thank you. Thank you very much for your speech. We’ll look into this.

Rick Lane: And hopefully it's part of Work Stream 1 and included as part of the bylaws. Thank you.

Fadi Chehade: Sorry, if I may just clarify, we do not have lobbyists that we don't disclose. Period. Let’s just be very clear. Any lobbyist we pay is disclosed.

Right but --

Fadi Chehade: all the lobbyists we have in the U.S. --

Steve Crocker: Fadi --

Fadi Chehade: This is an important point because there's a definition of lobbyists but it's not people who influence outside of the U.S.

Steve Crocker: Stop. Please stop.

Fadi Chehade: This is actually wrong.

Steve Crocker: Please stop. Thank you.

Wolfgang Kleinwachter: By the way, your speech is on the record so it means everybody can read it.



Methinks Fadi doth protest too much--what's ICANN CEO Fadi Chehade trying to hide? 




DISCLAIMER

Domain Mondo archive