Showing posts with label DMCA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label DMCA. Show all posts

2018-11-04

News Review: 1) ICANN EPDP Draft Initial Report, 2) Verisign & .COM

graphic "News Review" ©2016 DomainMondo.com
Domain Mondo's weekly internet domain news review (NR 2018-11-04 with analysis and opinion: Features • 1) ICANN WHOIS & GDPR: EPDP Draft Initial Report,  2) NTIA & Verisign Extend Cooperative Agreement on .COM, and more  3) Other ICANN news,  4) ICYMI: a. China 'Hijacking' the West's Internet Backbone, b. ITU Plenipotentiary Conference 2018, c. EU Link Tax, d. DMCA Exemptions,  5) Most Read.

Updates: EPDP Meeting Thursday Nov 8 (wiki page, agenda, docs) at 14:00UTC (9am EST). See EPDP mail list for additional items, particularly this (from Milton Mueller) and this (from Lindsay Hamilton-Reid). Adobe Connect recording, chat transcript (pdf) embed below, Meeting transcript (pdf), meeting notes & action items here.

EPDP Meeting Tuesday Nov 6 (wiki page, agenda, docs) at 14:00 UTC (9am EST). MP3Adobe Connect recording, meeting transcript (pdf), and chat transcript (pdf) embed below. Additional discussion items on the mail list starting with "Proposed Agenda and items for input - EPDP Team Meeting #23" from Marika Konings Nov 5, 2018, here, including (but not limited to) the EPDP Chair's entry here.

Original post:
1) ICANN WHOIS & GDPR: EPDP Draft Initial Report
The EPDP Draft Initial Report (pdf) is still a "work in progress" and there will be many revisions before it is published for public comment. The initial draft (pdf link above) was prepared by ICANN staff and first shown to the EPDP working group on Thursday, Nov 1, 2018, at the EPDP meeting:
"... And then we want to share with you the first version – the proposed draft initial first version of the initial report that been working on, you know, up until – not too many minutes ago, and so while we haven't distributed yet we’ll take you through it and we’ll put a link to a wiki page so you can download if you want ..."--EPDP Chair Kurt Pritz, transcript (pdf), p. 2.
Later in that Thursday (Nov 1) EPDP meeting, ICANN staff member Marika Konings led the EPDP working group through the draft initial report (transcript, pp. 30-38) excerpt:
"... What we’ve done in the report, and I’ll slowly start walking you through it, as said, you know, executive summary has some of the background elements already there but the biggest part and the meat of course of the report will be the proposed response to the charter questions and the preliminary recommendations which will need to be updated ..." (Ibid., p. 31) (emphasis added)
Comments from EPDP members at the Nov. 1st meeting [chat transcript (pdf)]:
Thomas Rickert (ISPCP): "So we will publish the [initial] report without legal vetting and we will only have 1 public comment period? That sounds like quite a brave plan."
Milton Mueller (NCSG): "After working on the Purposes for several months as "lettered" elements (A, B,. C, etc.) in the report the purposes are numbered. Will this cause confusion in the EPDP group? Should we retain the letters?" Marika Konings: "@Milton - one reason was to move from letters to numbers was that it might be confusing for the broader community to see letters with a clear gap / letters missing."Milton Mueller (NCSG): "Hmmm, you could designate deleted purposes as deleted. e.g., H - deleted." Thomas Rickert (ISPCP): "I would even offer brief rationales as to what happened to the missing letters, why they were deleted." Stephanie Perrin (NCSG): "Agree with Thomas, we need to discuss what is not there as much as what is there."
EPDP Meetings this coming week: Tuesday Nov 6 and Thursday Nov 8. New starting times this week: 14:00 UTC (9am EST). Observers: Adobe Connect, or audio cast (browser or app). See also GNSO Council EPDP page and updates. Links to all EPDP meetings' transcripts and recordings are on the GNSO calendar. Other EPDP links: wiki, mail list, action items, Temp Spec, EPDP Charter (pdf), Data Elements Workbooks (pdf).

How far behind is the EPDP working group in getting out the Initial Report? The August version of the EPDP timeline shows an initial report should have already been produced and published for public comment. The most recent revised timeline (as of Nov 1, 2018):

Further information on last week's EPDP meetings on last week's News ReviewAlso note:
 Understanding RDAP (Registration Data Access Protocoland the Role it can Play in RDDS (Registration Data Directory Services) Policy ICANN63 presentation Oct 22, 2018 (pdf) excerpts:
p.12: "With RDAP, a Registry can point the end-user to the Registrar’s RDAP in order to obtain authoritative information maintained by the Registrar." [Editor's note: no need for data transfer to registry operator?]; pp. 13, 15 below.

 geoTLD GDPR survey results (pdf) excerpt: "How does your WHOIS look like today?"

2) Names, Domains & Trademarks: NTIA, Verisign & .COM
graphic "Names, Domains & Trademarks" ©2017 DomainMondo.com
a. NTIA Statement on Amendment 35 to the Cooperative Agreement with Verisign, November 01, 2018 (emphasis and link added):
NTIA and Verisign have agreed to extend and modify the Cooperative Agreement. These modifications are in line with policy priorities of the Trump Administration. The changes create a new commitment to content neutrality in the Domain Name System (DNS), provide market-based pricing flexibility, and reduce the regulatory burden on Verisign.
Amendment 35 [pdf] confirms that Verisign will operate the .com registry in a content neutral manner with a commitment to participate in ICANN processes. To that end, NTIA looks forward to working with Verisign and other ICANN stakeholders in the coming year on trusted notifier programs to provide transparency and accountability in the .com top level domain.
The amendment repeals Obama-era price controls and provides Verisign the pricing flexibility to change its .com Registry Agreement with ICANN to increase wholesale .com prices. Specifically, the flexibility permits Verisign to pursue with ICANN an up to 7 percent increase in the prices for .com domain names, in each of the last four years of the six-year term of the .com Registry Agreement. The changes also affirm that Verisign may not vertically integrate or operate as a registrar in the .com top level domain.
Editor's noteThere's a lot to like, dislike, and be concerned about, in Amendment 35.  My own position has been clear, see my submission to NTIA July 17, 2018 (pdf), particularly at p. 12 and exhibits starting on p. 13). Bottom-line: I am thankful NTIA extended the Cooperative Agreement. There is a long history in .COM, and RFC 1591 by Jon Postel is the "holy scripture" in defining this global public resource,  this top-level domain (TLD) .COM. A secondary authoritative resource in understanding .COM is the George W. Bush Administration's U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division letter of December 3, 2008 (see pp. 13-20, of my submission to NTIA, supra).

I expected some price increase, and while this increase is generous to Verisign, it is also obvious Verisign wanted even more, and Verisign would have already gotten more from ICANN.

There's also a lot of "noise" in the domaining blogosphere since the announcement (see, e.g., here, here and here. I suggest complaining registrants consider using the 2-year window (from now until Oct 26, 2020) to determine their core long-term .COM domain holdings and renew those domains for 10 years to avoid price increases which will likely begin in late 2020 (2020 could be a banner year for .COM revenue for registrars and Verisign with registrants renewing for multiple years ahead of the price increases).

Investors in Verisign $VRSN reacted favorably to the news--Verisign shares closed Friday, Nov 2, 2018, at $165.02 UP +$24.22, +17.20%, a $2.92 Billion Increase in Market Capitalization:
$VRSN
With ICANN now allowing Verisign to increase .NET prices by 10% per year, compounded, and no price controls whatever on new gTLDs, .COM registrants probably couldn't have hoped for a better outcome to the NTIA-Verisign Cooperative Agreement Amendment 35. The Obama administration essentially "sold out" .COM registrants by agreeing to the IANA transition (effective October 1, 2016), without any provisions for extending price controls on .COM after Nov 30, 2018. See U.S. Senator Ted Cruz's letter of August 12, 2016 (pdf).

There were also many other factors beyond just .COM pricing at play in the negotiations between Verisign and NTIA, including pressure upon NTIA from special interest groups, particularly intellectual property lobbyists.

Amendment 35 allows Verisign to increase the wholesale price of .COM from $7.85 starting Oct 26, 2020--effective date of Amendment 35 is Oct 26, 2018--up to 7% per year, which could produce a wholesale price of $10.29 the final year of the initial (six-year) extended term ending in 2024, if my calculator is right:
Most, if not all, .COM registrants (including domain investors) can live with that, and thrive. You might even want to diversify your investment portfolio by adding some Verisign shares. What the future holds after Nov 30, 2024, we really don't know. We don't even know if ICANN will still be around by then, note this language from Amendment 35:

b.  Gab.com
Andrew Torba, CEO Gab.com: "Gab has spent the past 48 hours proudly working with the DOJ and FBI to bring justice to an alleged terrorist ... In the midst of this Gab has been no-platformed by essential internet infrastructure providers at every level. We are the most censored, smeared, and no-platformed startup in history, which means we are a threat to the media and to the Silicon Valley Oligarchy. Gab isn’t going anywhere. It doesn’t matter what you write. It doesn’t matter what the sophist talking heads say on TV. It doesn’t matter what verified nobodies say on Twitter. We have plenty of options, resources, and support. We will exercise every possible avenue to keep Gab online and defend free speech and individual liberty for all people. You have all just made Gab a nationally recognized brand as the home of free speech online at a time when Silicon Valley is stifling political speech they disagree with to interfere in a US election ...." [more at Gab.com link above].

See alsoCorporate Speech Police Are Not the Answer to Online Hate--EFF.org and "First it was Milo and Alex Jones, now platforms are being de-platformed"--Columbia Journalism Review | cjr.org.

c. Why New Entrepreneurs in India go online despite offline being such a huge market in India?  Setting up a website including buying a good domain name, hosting and other essentials only costs a few thousand rupees.--indianweb2.com.

d.  New gTLD .AMAZON "moves forward but work remains before ‘.amazon’ becomes a reality"--worldtrademarkreview.com.

e. Google's new gTLD .new shortcuts 
Docs: doc.new, docs.new, document.new; Forms: form.new, forms.new; Sheets: sheet.new, sheets.new, spreadsheet.new; Sites: site.new, sites.new, website.new; Slides: slides.new, deck.new, presentation.new.

f. GoDaddy $GDDY Q3 2018 Earnings LIVE Webcast, Nov. 6, 5pm ET.

g. Tucows Inc. (NASDAQ: TCX, TSX: TC), domain name registrar and technology company, will report its third quarter 2018 financial results via news release on Wednesday, November 7, 2018 at 5:05 p.m. ET, and concurrently also post management’s pre-recorded remarks discussing the quarter and outlook for the Company at http://www.tucows.com/investors/financials.

3) Other ICANN News
graphic "ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers"
a. NTIA Administrator David Redl sent a letter (pdf) dated Oct 26, 2018, to ICANN Board of Directors Chair Cherine Chalaby raising concerns about an accountability deficit at ICANN, stating:
"[r]ecent ICANN senior staff departures have highlighted that ICANN lacks post-employment restrictions," and recommending an immediate review as well as "cooling off periods" as a potential solution "to ensure that conflicts of interest or appearances of unethical behavior are minimized." (emphasis added)
Editor's note: for more information and background see also:
  • This "revelation" about Fadi Chehade:
b. New gTLD .PHARMACY: a global public resource operated in the global public interest?

ICANN.org"12 July 2018: ICANN Sends Notice of Breach to Registry (National Association of Boards of Pharmacy (pharmacy)) Data and Documents Under Review by ICANN; Cure Period Extended Until 1 October 2018; Data and Documents Under Review by ICANN; Breaches Cured 3 October 2018."

c. ICANN's dotBrand Extortion Racket (pdf)--Promoters' ICANN63 presentation (pdf).

4) ICYMI Internet Domain News 
graphic "ICYMI Internet Domain News" ©2017 DomainMondo.com
• China has been 'hijacking the vital internet backbone of western countries' for intelligence gathering after it signed the Obama-Xi cyber pact in late 2015, according to researchers from the US Naval War College and Tel Aviv University. The report says Chinese state-owned China Telecom has been one of the internet's most determined BGP hijackers. Editor's note: Download the report hereSee also China’s Internet Of Things (IoT) A Global Cybersecurity Threat?


 PP-18, ITU Plenipotentiary Conference 2018, Dubai, UAE (continues thru Nov 16).
"I am pleased that Doreen Bogdan Martin, an NTIA alum, has been elected as the Director of the ITU Development Sector. Doreen is immensely qualified and the United States looks forward to working with her and continuing in our role on the ITU Council to support the global expansion of communications technologies. Significantly, she is the first woman to hold one of the ITU’s five elected positions, and her leadership will give the United States a voice in ITU leadership for the first time in three decades."--Assistant Secretary for Communications and Information and NTIA Administrator David Redl.

 EU: The EU's Link Tax Will Kill Open Access and Creative Commons News--EFF.org.

 US: New Exemptions to DMCA Section 1201 Are Welcome, But Don’t Go Far Enough--EFF.org.

2017-02-26

News Review: ICANN Multistakeholder vs Multilateral Internet Governance

News Review | ©2016 DomainMondo.com
Domain Mondo's weekly review of internet domain news:

Features • 1. ICANN Multistakeholder vs Multilateral Internet Governance; 2. Why ICANN Multistakeholderism Is Failing; 3. Private Agreements and Antitrust Liability; 4. How ICANN threatens DNS Security & Stability; 5. Phishers shifting to ICANN's new gTLDs; 6. Bogus DMCA Take Down Notices; 7. TMCH Revised Report; 8. Internet Freedom Report: Malta, Cameroon, China; 9. A 'Digital Geneva Convention'; 10. Trump's Trademark in China; 11. Outlook email for your domain name; 12. SHA1 collision; 13. Hacked ICANN data still sells; 14. ICANN events May 9-15 in Madrid; 15. ICANN Public Comment Periods closing in March; 16. Most popular posts this past week.

1. ICANN Multistakeholder vs Multilateral Internet Governance
"I think if we get rid of that [IANA functions] contract we will be free of the pressures"--ICANN President and CEO Fadi Chehade, February 10, 2015.
February 2017: "... The reformed [ICANN] multistakeholder internet governance approach faces significant challenges ... If the multistakeholder model is seen as ineffective in addressing the vulnerabilities that enable cybercrime, or being completely peripheral to the issue, developing economies could question its legitimacy and seek answers in the multilateral system .... "There are also worries that ICANN, the operator of the IANA functions, will abuse its authority and ignore the interests of internet users. In the past, ICANN has been accused of ignoring the views of governments, prioritizing private sector interests, and mismanaging its finances. ICANN recently implemented enhancements to address these and similar concerns. Nevertheless, ensuring that ICANN remains accountable will be critical to demonstrating that the multistakeholder approach works. It will also act as a bulwark against Russian and Chinese efforts at greater intergovernmental control over the internet."--Maintaining U.S. Leadership on Internet Governance | Council on Foreign Relations | cfr.org (emphasis added).

2. Why ICANN multistakeholderism is failing--"industry self-regulation often fails to protect the public"--"lack of transparency, accountability, participation, and representation"--
source: Presentation on DNS and Content Regulation | Electronic Frontier Foundation
source: Presentation on DNS and Content Regulation | Electronic Frontier Foundation
Note re: Public Interest Registry's arbitration process--Systemic Copyright Infringement Alternative Dispute Resolution Policy (SCDRP) | Public Interest Registry | pir.org February 23, 2017--"Given certain concerns that have been recently raised in the public domain, Public Interest Registry is pausing its SCDRP development process to reflect on those concerns and consider forward steps. We will hold [i.e., stop] any further development of the SCDRP until further notice." (emphasis added)
UPDATE: Shadow Regulation Withers In The Sunlight | Electronic Frontier Foundation | eff.org: "... It’s not surprising that a plan developed in secret, without input from Internet users, would disregard users’ rights. As we’ve explained, truly “healthy” Internet governance requires inclusion, balance, and accountability, all of which were absent here. Public Interest Registry did the right thing by hitting the brakes on this proposal. Its brief announcement today acknowledges the importance of good policy-development processes ..."
ICANN's Commercial and Business Users Constituency (BC), Intellectual Property Constituency (IPC), ISPs and Connectivity Providers Constituency (ISPCP) complain about the NonCommercial Users Constituency (NCUC.orgsession at ICANN57 "DNS and Content Regulation" (one leading participant was Electronic Frontier Foundation, EFF.org)--
15 Feb 2017 Letter from BC, IPC and ISPCP (pdf) to Göran Marby, Steve Crocker, and ICANN Board of Directors, published by ICANN on 21 February 2017:
"... for the Hyderabad meeting, a single sponsor group proposed a HIT (High Interest Topic) session on DNS and Content Regulation. Initially, the sponsoring group was allowed to select panelists and designate the moderator, who was also part of the sponsoring organization. Through persistence by other stakeholders, panel participation was broadened considerably. Still, during the HIT session, the sponsoring organization opened with a presentation of their position. In our view, this did not meet the level of broad participation of the ICANN community to warrant a high-interest session ..."
Response from Göran Marby, ICANN President & CEO (embedded below, highlighting added)--or how ICANN subtly shuts down free speech, participation, and representation that conflicts with powerful private profit-seeking corporate interests such as represented by BC, IPC, and ISPCP, and the other unelected non-governmental special interests that dominate ICANN--



3.  Private Agreements and Antitrust Liability--Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45 "(a)(1) Unfair methods of competition in or affecting commerce, and unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce, are hereby declared unlawful .... (4) (B) All remedies available to the Commission with respect to unfair and deceptive acts or practices shall be available for acts and practices described in this paragraph, including restitution to domestic or foreign victims." (emphasis added)--See Opinion and Order of the Federal Trade Commission (pdf) In the Matter of 1-800 Contacts, Inc., Docket No. 9372 (keyword advertising bidding agreements):
",,, Given that the Complaint alleges liability based only on private agreements that do not constitute government petitioning, 1-800 Contacts’ Third Defense fails .... Because the Complaint alleges that 1-800 Contacts violated Section 5 solely by entering into private bidding agreements, we hold that the Noerr-Pennington doctrine does not apply and 1-800 Contacts’ Third Defense fails as a matter of law. Similarly, because Complaint Counsel need not prove 1-800 Contacts’ lawsuits to be objectively and subjectively unreasonable to establish a Section 5 violation, 1-800 Contacts’ Second Defense also fails. We therefore grant Complaint Counsel’s motion." (emphasis added)

4.  How ICANN threatens Domain Name System Security & Stability:
"In 2015, ICANN's compliance department caused financial harm to a domain name registrant because of a minor, perceived inaccuracy in their domain name's WHOIS records. In this instance, the registrant had a mailing address in Virginia and a phone number with a Tennessee area code. While both details were valid, and the registrant was contactable, a "violent criminal” filed a complaint with ICANN alleging that the details were inaccurate. The complaint was accepted by ICANN and passed along to the domain name registrar. The registrar, fearing a non-compliance notice from ICANN, suspended the domain name without performing any investigation into the claim, resulting in the registrant losing access to their business email account and website."--source infra--
At the NCPH Intersessional, [ICANN] Compliance Concerns Take Centre Stage | circleid.com Feb 23, 2017: ".... as things stand at present, if a domain name can be repossessed from a registrant for any reason at all, without any due process being followed, and in direct violation of Article 1 of the organisation's bylaws, it might well be ICANN that is posing a threat to the security and stability of the Domain Name System" (emphasis added).  See also ICANN Compliance Lends a Hand to a Violent Criminal While Trashing a Legitimate Business | circleid.com.

Editor's note: never forget that among the real core values of ICANN, as established during the Fadi Chehade-Akram Atallah regime (2012-2016), are dishonesty, incompetence, and cronyism.

5. New study reveals phishers are shifting their sights to ICANN's new gTLDs and the cloud: "A study by cybersecurity firm PhishLabs indicates that the volume of phishing attacks grew by almost one-third last year, with cloud storage brands set to overtake financial services as the top targets. Researchers also found that phishing perpetrators are increasingly turning to new gTLDs to dupe internet users."--WorldTrademarkReview.com (emphasis and link added).

6. Bogus DMCA Take Down Notices: in a comment to the U.S. Copyright Office (pdf), Google reports that 99.95% of URLs it was asked to take down last month didn't even exist in its search indexes. "For example, in January 2017, the most prolific submitter submitted notices that Google honored for 16,457,433 URLs. But on further inspection, 16,450,129 (99.97%) of those URLs were not in our search index in the first place."

7. Trademark Clearinghouse Revised Report | ICANN.org: On 23 February 2017, ICANN published the Revised Report of the Independent Review of the Trademark Clearinghouse (pdf): "...  we find that although trademark holders value access to the Sunrise period and many submit proof of use to become eligible for Sunrise registrations, few trademark holders make [new gTLD] Sunrise registrations. This could be due in part to the expense of Sunrise registrations or because other protections of the TMCH services reduce the need for trademark holders to utilize Sunrise registrations." (emphasis added)

8. Internet Freedom Report: Malta, Cameroon, China:
  • Maltese protest proposed internet news laws: Several thousands people took to the streets of the capital of Malta on Sunday to protest against a new bill that will force Internet news sites to register with the government.--Reuters.com
  • Cameroon must urgently free the internet in Anglophone regions - UN expert | AfricaNews.com: "Cameroon should immediately reverse the ‘‘appalling violation of their (citizen’s) right to freedom of expression,” in its Anglophone regions by restoring internet access, a United Nations expert has said."
  • China Ramps Up Control of Domain Names, Adds New Layer to Great Firewall | rfa.org"The draft regulations, which were first released for public consultation in March 2016, would require any websites operating in China to register with a Chinese domain name, which is subject to state control and can be used to shut down entire websites within the country-level .cn top-level domain."
Also note: Internet Freedom Festival | 6 – 10 March 2017: The Global Unconference of the Internet Freedom Communities, March 6-10, 2017, Valencia, Spain.

9.  A 'Digital Geneva Convention': "... Just as the Fourth Geneva Convention has long protected civilians in times of war, we now need a Digital Geneva Convention that will commit governments to protecting civilians from nation-state attacks in times of peace. And just as the Fourth Geneva Convention recognized that the protection of civilians required the active involvement of the Red Cross, protection against nation-state cyberattacks requires the active assistance of technology companies. The tech sector plays a unique role as the internet’s first responders, and we therefore should commit ourselves to collective action that will make the internet a safer place, affirming a role as a neutral Digital Switzerland that assists customers everywhere and retains the world’s trust ..."--Brad Smith, Microsoft President and Chief Legal Officer, blogs.microsoft.com. See also Bruce Schneier: It's time for internet-of-things regulation | searchsecurity.techtarget.com.

10.  Names, Domains, Trademarks: President Trump wins trademark rights for his name in China | worldipreview.com.

11.  Outlook email for your domain name:
  • Hands-On with Outlook.com Premium | Thurrott.com"if you sign up now, “your subscriptions will auto-renew annually at $19.95 (Outlook.com Premium) .... This is an affordable option*, and it’s a nice way for a family to get a custom domain and not be stuck with an outlook.com or hotmail.com address."
  • More info:  https://premium.outlook.com/#/Offer  "you can create personalized addresses for up to 5 people and sync everything to your existing Outlook.com mailbox."
  • See also: "the $20 offer is still available, so if you’re looking to save some money, you might want to move quickly: This offer expires March 31, 2017. Note that you still need to pay for your custom domain. You can do that via an outside registrar or through Microsoft"--Thurrott.com

12. Announcing the first SHA1 collision | security.googleblog.com"For the tech community, our findings emphasize the necessity of sunsetting SHA-1 usage. Google has advocated the deprecation of SHA-1 for many years, particularly when it comes to signing TLS certificates."

13. Hacked ICANN data still sells for hundreds of dollars years after breach | cyberscoop.com: "Three years after hackers used a spearphishing attack to successfully gain access to internal data at the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), the data is still being passed around and sold on black markets for $300, complete with claims that it’s never been leaked before."

14. ICANN events May 9-15 in Madrid: 1) ICANN GDD Industry Summit May 9-11, 2017; 2) 6th Registration Operations Workshop May 12, 2017; 3) ICANN DNS Symposium May 13, 2017; 4) OARC 26 May 14-15, 2017. Read more at InternetSociety.org.

15. ICANN Public Comment Periods that close in March, 2017:

16.  Most popular posts (# of pageviews Sun-Sat) this past week on DomainMondo.com:
  1. News Review: China Cyber Sovereignty vs ICANN Multistakeholderism
  2. Three Business Lessons You Can Learn From Airbnb (video)
  3. Splunk $SPLK Helping Companies Make Sense of Machine Data (video)
  4. TechReview | Zuck's Facebook Letter and the Snapchat $SNAP IPO (video)

-- John Poole, Editor, Domain Mondo 

feedback & comments via twitter @DomainMondo


DISCLAIMER

2015-09-30

TPP, Trans-Pacific Partnership, Atlanta Meeting Sep 30-Oct 1 (video)


TPP Crunch Time: What's Holding It Up? (source: Bloomberg)
ITS Global Managing Director Alan Oxley discusses the Trans-Pacific Partnership, and the talks that resume in Atlanta this week, and whether a deal can be reached. He speaks to Bloomberg's Angie Lau on "First Up." Published on Sep 28, 2015

ITS Global | Consultants on Global Issues: [domain name: itsglobal.net]"ITS Global is a dynamic consultancy specialising in public policy in the Asia Pacific region. Its expertise include: trade, economics and investment; environment and sustainability; aid and development; and corporate social responsibility and risk. It enables clients to assess implications of policy; develop and implement strategies to manage policy impacts; and to improve policy formulation."

United States to Host Trans-Pacific Partnership Trade Ministers’ Meeting in Atlanta | United States Trade Representative"The United States will host a meeting of Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) Trade Ministers in Atlanta, GA from September 30th – October 1st preceded by a meeting of TPP Chief Negotiators from September 26th-29th.  Trade Ministers and negotiators last met in July and have been making good progress toward resolving the limited number of outstanding issues."

What is the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP)? According to the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF): "The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) is a secretive, multinational trade agreement that threatens to extend restrictive intellectual property (IP) laws across the globe and rewrite international rules on its enforcement. The main problems are two-fold:
(1) Intellectual Property Chapter: Leaked draft texts of the agreement show that the IP chapter would have extensive negative ramifications for users’ freedom of speech, right to privacy and due process, and hinder peoples' abilities to innovate.
(2) Lack of Transparency: The entire process has shut out multi-stakeholder participation and is shrouded in secrecy.
The twelve nations currently negotiating the TPP are the US, Japan, Australia, Peru, Malaysia, Vietnam, New Zealand, Chile, Singapore, Canada, Mexico, and Brunei Darussalam. The TPP contains a chapter on intellectual property covering copyright, trademarks, and patents. Since the draft text of the agreement has never been officially released to the public, we know from leaked documents, such as the May 2014 draft of the TPP Intellectual Property Chapter [PDF], that US negotiators are pushing for the adoption of copyright measures far more restrictive than currently required by international treaties, including the controversial Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA).
The TPP Will Rewrite Global Rules on Intellectual Property Enforcement
All signatory countries will be required to conform their domestic laws and policies to the provisions of the Agreement. In the US, this is likely to further entrench controversial aspects of US copyright law (such as the Digital Millennium Copyright Act[DMCA]) and restrict the ability of Congress to engage in domestic law reform to meet the evolving IP needs of American citizens and the innovative technology sector. The recently leaked US-proposed IP chapter also includes provisions that appear to go beyond current US law.
The leaked US IP chapter includes many detailed requirements that are more restrictive than current international standards, and would require significant changes to other countries’ copyright laws. These include obligations for countries to:
Place Greater Liability on Internet Intermediaries: The TPP would force the adoption of the US DMCA Internet intermediaries copyright safe harbor regime in its entirety. For example, this would require Chile to rewrite its forward-looking 2010 copyright law that currently establishes a judicial notice-and-takedown regime, which provides greater protection to Internet users’ expression and privacy than the DMCA.
Escalate Protections for Digital Locks: It will compel signatory nations to enact laws banning circumvention of digital locks (technological protection measures or TPMs)[PDF] that mirror the DMCA and treat violation of the TPM provisions as a separate offense even when no copyright infringement is involved. This would require countries like New Zealand to completely rewrite its innovative 2008 copyright law, as well as override Australia’s carefully-crafted 2007 TPM regime exclusions for region-coding on movies on DVDs, video games, and players, and for embedded software in devices that restrict access to goods and services for the device—a thoughtful effort by Australian policy makers to avoid the pitfalls experienced with the US digital locks provisions. In the US, business competitors have used the DMCA to try to block printer cartridge refill services, competing garage door openers, and to lock mobile phones to particular network providers.
Create New Threats for Journalists and Whistleblowers: Dangerously vague text on the misuse of trade secrets, which could be used to enact harsh criminal punishments against anyone who reveals or even accesses information through a "computer system" that is allegedly confidential.
Expand Copyright Terms: Create copyright terms well beyond the internationally agreed period in the 1994 Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS). The TPP could extend copyright term protections from life of the author + 50 years, to Life + 70 years for works created by individuals, and either 95 years after publication or 120 years after creation for corporate owned works (such as Mickey Mouse). Read more about the TPP Copyright Trap.
Enact a "Three-Step Test" Language That Puts Restrictions on Fair Use
: The U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) is putting fair use at risk with restrictive language in the TPP's IP chapter. US and Australia have proposed very restrictive text, while other countries such as Chile, New Zealand, and Malaysia, have proposed more flexible, user-friendly terms.
Adopt Criminal Sanctions: Adopt criminal sanctions for copyright infringement that is done without a commercial motivation. Users could be jailed or hit with debilitating fines over file sharing, and may have their property or domains seized even without a formal complaint from the copyright holder...."


See also:



DISCLAIMER

Domain Mondo archive