Showing posts with label new gTLD. Show all posts
Showing posts with label new gTLD. Show all posts

2019-03-10

News Review 1) ICANN64 Kobe, March 9-14, 2) .AFRICA Litigation Update

graphic "News Review" ©2016 DomainMondo.com
Domain Mondo's weekly internet domain news review (NR 2019-03-10) with analysis and opinion: Features • 1) ICANN64, Kobe, Japan, March 9-14, 2) Other ICANN news: a. .AFRICA Litigation UPDATE, b. ICANN's 'BIG Money Grab' UPDATE, and more, 3) a. ccTLD .IO, b. New gTLDs + 5 Years, 4) ICYMI: VPNs, Data Brokers, Identity Theft, Internet Tax, 5) Most Read.

1) ICANN64, Kobe, Japan, March 9-14

UPDATE: LIVE ICANN64 videos embed below and here starting 13 March 2019, 7:30 pm EDT (US) which is 8:30 am March 14 in Kobe.

EPDP Team Meeting (4 of 4) 8:30 - 10:15, Thu, Mar 14, 2019 / 7:30pm EDT, March 13 (US).
 EPDP meeting (4of4)
 Agenda: Review of draft work plan and approach coming out of Saturday’s session. Consider further input that may have been gathered throughout the week, including Council input from weekend sessions as well as engagement session with TSG. Confirm next steps and next meeting Adobe Connect link, slides (pdf), mind map (pdf), wiki, and mail list.

LIVE (and replay) ICANN64 videos from Kobe, Japan:

ICANN Board Session on Governance


Q&A with ICANN Organization Executive Team


ICANN Public Forum 2


ICANN Board Meeting


Replay ICANN64 videos:
ICANN64 9-14 March 2019, Kobe, Japan: ICANN64 Schedule.
Date and time in Kobe, Japan:
Schedule Highlights (Sunday-Thursday) all times JST:
More info: last week's News Review, EPDP at Kobe (chart), agenda, chart of EPDP meetings 2, 3, 4, at ICANN64.
Meeting resources:

2) Other ICANN News
graphic "ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers"
a. New gTLD .AFRICA Litigation UPDATE
Future Hearings:
  • 04/04/2019 at 08:30 AM in Department 53 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012, Trial Setting Conference
  • 04/04/2019 at 08:30 AM in Department 53 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012, Non-Jury Trial

b. ICANN's 'BIG Money Grab' UPDATE: Legal and Fiduciary Constraints Related Materials including Updated Memo (pdf) embed below, from: Xavier Calvez, Chief Financial Officer and Samantha Eisner, Associate General Counsel, ICANN, re: Proceeds from ICANN's 'Last Resort' Auctions of new gTLDs:

Background: News Review | Greed is Good? ICANN Auctions & The Big 'Money Grab'

c. ICANN Correspondence:

3) Names, Domains & Trademarks
graphic "Names, Domains & Trademarks" ©2017 DomainMondo.com
a. ccTLD .IO re: ICJ Advisory Opinion (pdf)
b. New gTLDs + 5 Years
  • New TLDs five years in | DomainNameWire.com--"Registration numbers for new TLDs have not met expectations for just about anyone who put money into it. That includes the many registries that spent millions acquiring strings as well as ICANN."--Andrew Allemann. Editor's note: don't miss the comments, e.g., "5 years of orchestrated hype and fake demand are coming to an end. Result: enormous damage to the industry as a whole, and a confused consumer base."
  • BREAKING: .Boston Has Dropped into the Sea! Biggest nGTLD Collapse!​ | ricksblog.com--The real collapse has yet to come. Stay tuned as the black hole of domaining continues to dominate [new] GTLDs--Rick Schwartz. 

4) ICYMI Internet Domain News 
graphic "ICYMI Internet Domain News" ©2017 DomainMondo.com
Do You Trust Your VPN? Are You Sure?--slate.com: "Many VPNs appear to be outright scams ... they can see what you’re up to whenever you’re using the internet." 

The Data Brokers who are quietly buying and selling your personal information--fastcompany.com. See also: Warning: Your Identity Will Be Stolen--zerohedge.com. 

French tax on internet giants could yield 500 million euros per year--reuters.com: Google, Amazon, Facebook and Apple (“GAFA”) but also Uber, Airbnb, Booking and even French online advertising specialist Criteo are targets.

5) Most Read this past week on DomainMondo.com: 
graphic "Domain Mondo" ©2017 DomainMondo.com


-- John Poole, Editor • Domain Mondo 

feedback & comments via twitter @DomainMondo


DISCLAIMER

2019-02-28

UPDATE Afilias Domains No. 3 Limited v. ICANN re: new gTLD .WEB

Afilias Domains No. 3 Limited v. ICANN re: new gTLD .WEB
Editor's note: the latest "document dump" posted by ICANN in the pending Independent Review Process (IRP), although with redactions. The IRP was commenced on 26 November 2018; two panelists have been appointed; awaiting appointment of remaining panelist. No hearings are currently scheduled (as of Feb 25, 2019).


Claimant's Sur-Reply to Verisign, Inc. and Nu Dotco, LLC's Requests to Participate as Amicus Curiae in Independent Review Process (embed above)


ICANN's Reply to Claimant's Response to Verisign, Inc. and Nu Dotco, LLC's Requests to Participate as Amicus Curiae in Independent Review Process (embed above)

Nu Dotco, LLC's Reply in Support of Its Request to Participate as Amicus Curiae in Independent Review Process

Verisign, Inc.'s Reply in Support of Its Request to Participate as Amicus Curiae in Independent Review Process

Claimant's Responses to Procedures Officer's Questions Concerning the Drafting History of the Supplementary Procedures 28 January 2019

Claimant's Response to Verisign, Inc. and Nu Dotco, LLC's Requests to Participate as Amicus Curiae in Independent Review Process

2019-02-24

News Review | ICANN EPDP Chair Quits After Vote on Final Report Delayed

graphic "News Review" ©2016 DomainMondo.com
Domain Mondo's weekly internet domain news review (NR 2019-02-24) with analysis and opinion: Features • 1) ICANN EPDP Chair Quits After Vote on Final Report Delayed, 2) Other ICANN news: a. Namazi New GDD Sr. VP, b. New gTLD .AMAZON, and more, 3) a. Google's Extortionate Domaining, b. Booking.com Trademark Case, 4) ICYMI: Personal Data, Data Protection, Data Privacy, Access to Data, and more, 5) Most Read.

1) ICANN EPDP Chair Quits After Vote on EPDP Final Report (Phase 1) Delayed 
"For a set of personal and professional reasons, I am writing to resign my post as Chair of the EPDP for Registration Data. I was honored to be selected by the GNSO Council leadership for the post and attempted to live up to the position expectations and requirements at every moment since I began in July. I will stay on for as long as it takes to find a replacement Chair and smoothly transition the responsibilities ..."--resignation email from Kurt Pritz to GNSO Council Chair Keith Drazek, February 21, 2019, after deferral of the GNSO Council vote on the EPDP Final Report (Phase 1) (pdf) until March 4, 2019, as requested by the Business Constituency (BC) and supported by the Intellectual Property Constituency (IPC).
Response from GNSO Council Chair Keith Drazek: Hi Kurt, Thanks for your email, and more importantly for your commitment, sacrifice and service over the last seven months. I will follow up with another email soon, but I wanted to acknowledge receipt of your message and express my gratitude and appreciation on behalf of the GNSO Council. I also appreciate and welcome your willingness to continue as Chair during the transition to Phase 2 and the next Chair. Best regards, Keith.
Prescient email Feb. 20, 2019, below, from EPDP team member Dr. Milton Mueller (NCSG - Georgia Tech), responding to an earlier email from EPDP Chair Kurt Pritz wherein Pritz stated: "I chose not to conflate the number of groups with the voting scheme of the GNSO Council. I think that is the province of the Council, i.e., discussion at the Council level and the voting scheme will come into play there as items with “Strong Support" are considered."
"Sorry Kurt, but that’s not your call. As chair you can designate consensus levels but you do not have the authority to redefine the groups upon which consensus determinations are based. The CSG [Commercial Stakeholder Group] and the NCSG [Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group] both have 6 members on this EPDP team because they are both equivalent stakeholder groups in the chartering process. This was a point of considerable discussion in the formation of the EPDP and the result is not something you can toy with. Doing so leaves you and the whole process subject to legitimacy and bias challenges. The fact that CSG’s 3 constituencies [IPC, BC, ISPCP] insist on independent representation is a choice they have made and can make but it does not change their status as a single SG, a single group for the purposes of consensus determinations. I am sure you don’t want our painstaking work product to be further delayed by procedural and legitimacy challenges, including an independent review process [IRP], but I assure you that is what will happen if you try to disenfranchise an SG by double or triple counting the constituents of another SG." (emphasis and link added)
EPDP Timeline (as of Feb 24, 89 days until the Temporary Specification expires 25 May 2019):
source: icann.org
Analysis & Opinion Editor's note: Kurt Pritz has a long history with ICANN according to his outdated bio on the ICANNwiki, having been appointed as a Vice President of ICANN in 2003. He was heavily involved in ICANN's controversial new gTLDs program as ICANN's Chief Strategy Officer, but suddenly resigned on November 15, 2012, due to an undisclosed conflict of interest. After he left ICANN he became Executive Director of the Domain Name Association, a domain name industry group principally representing the interests of new gTLD registry operators. He resigned from that position in 2015, and thereafter has been involved with various domain name industry firms, including Allegravita, and Architelos (which filed for bankruptcy after being hit with a judgment in a lawsuit brought by registry services provider Afilias), and most recently has been involved with the new gTLD .ART.

I have no idea why Pritz wanted to be EPDP Chair, nor why the GNSO Council appointed him in July, 2018, but I think Pritz saw the handwriting on the wall, and had the good judgment to realize he had already had enough of chairing the EPDP, a task for which he seemed ill-suited from the start. Pritz readily admitted he was far out of his depth, and as Chair, he failed to develop and follow a cogent work plan for Phase 1, apparently relying instead, on ICANN support staff who were as ignorant about the intricacies of the GDPR as he was. Last year, wasting weeks trying to "redline" the Temp Spec per Pritz's directions, EPDP team members repeatedly tried to steer the group back to functionality, with Thomas Rickert finally stating the obvious: "We are trying to fix a document (Temp Spec) that can hardly be fixed." 

It is actually painful to go back and read those transcripts from last year's EPDP meetings. Almost every meeting reeks of dysfunction and lack of direction, and many EPDP members knew it at the time, and often expressed their frustrations on the record. But that is all water under the bridge now. The EPDP Phase 2 will deal with difficult "access issues" and unfortunately, Phase 1 failed to fix or adequately address many core issues, such as controllership, upon which access policy decisions may be dependent. Ideally, the EPDP team needs a Chair who is both knowledgeable about the GDPR, as well as experienced in GNSO PDP consensus processes and procedures. Perhaps Co-Chairs, with one who is knowledgeable about GDPR, and the other experienced in GNSO PDP consensus processes and procedures.

More info: EPDP team mail list and wiki; GNSO mail list and calendar; EPDP Final Report (pdf); EPDP Charter (pdf); Bird & Bird legal memos; EPDP legal mail list; ICANN's controllership legal memo (pdf); last week's News Review. There will be no EPDP meetings until after the GNSO Council vote on March 4, 2019.

2) Other ICANN News
graphic "ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers"
a. Cyrus Namazi promoted to Senior Vice President of ICANN's Global Domains Division (GDD), succeeding his crony, at Conexant and ICANN, former GDD President Akram Atallah, who resigned last year to become CEO of new gTLDs registry operator Donuts, Inc. The ICANN announcement indicates that Atallah's former title of "GDD President," (given to him by his crony, long-time friend and ICANN CEO, Fadi Chehade, in June, 2013) has been abolished. ICANN didn't disclose whether Namazi is receiving the same extravagant compensation package as Atallah did.

b. New gTLD .AMAZON UPDATE
21 Feb 2019 Letter from Achilles Zaluar* to ICANNBoard (pdf)--*Achilles Zaluar is Director, Department of Technological Promotion, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Brazil--excerpt:
"We regret that our invitation to the ICANN CEO and his team to join Brazil and several other Amazon Cooperation Treaty Organization (ACTO) member states in a video conference on 19 February on the “.Amazon” issue was not accepted. Our common goal is still to find a mutually acceptable solution for the “.Amazon” applications .... despite our best efforts, time seems to have ran out to work on a mutually acceptable solution before ICANN 64 in Kobe. We remain committed to do it in the coming months, with a view to develop a solution that fulfills GAC´s request to the ICANN Board. We therefore kindly request that the ICANN Board postpone a final decision on the .Amazon applications to ICANN 65, with a view to allow the eight Amazon countries and Amazon Inc. to find a mutually acceptable solution ..." 
Letter (pdf) from ICANN CEO Göran Marby to Secretary General PS/ACTO Alexandra Moreira:
See also 13 Feb 2019 Letter from Alexandra Moreira to Göran Marby.

c. IDNs: Letter from ICANN GDD Cyrus Namazi to Wang Wei et al. 15 Feb 2019, re: Root Zone LGR Generation Panels, excerpt:
".... The CJK GPs correctly note that visual similarity of strings causing confusability should be resolved by String Similarity Panels during TLD string evaluation, String Confusion Objection and String Contention Mechanisms ... an important part of the Procedure and helps ensure that the RZ-LGR satisfies the “Contextual Safety Principle” which asks to minimize the risk of malicious use of IDN labels. As well noted in your communication, the visually similar strings, which are not deemed identical, will continue to be evaluated by the String Similarity Review processes. Due to the independent nature of the working of the IP [Integration Panel], as stipulated by the Procedure, ICANN org suggests that the CJK GPs continue discussions with the IP in order to find a mutually agreeable solution based on the Procedure. ICANN org will organize a face to face meeting of the GPs and IP at the ICANN64 meeting in Kobe, Japan to continue to support this dialogue."
d. ICANN Notice of Breach to Registrar (pdf), excerpt:

e. 13 February 2019 Letter to ICANN (pdf), excerpt below, and ICANN response (pdf).
"... despite several attempts of communication with the reseller and registrar neither parties are responding to my requests. I act for Mr Khan as his IT consultant. I am unable to access the domain so I cannot prevent it from expiring and I cannot access my account or update nameservers or WHOIS information. This is causing me to suffer an immense loss of business. Please, can you get involved and somehow shake these rogue traders up so that they comply and cooperate?" (emphasis added)
f. Public Comments Close 5 Mar 2019 23:59 UTC on First Consultation on a 2-Year Planning Process | ICANN.org.

g. Technical Study Group (TSG) Advances Draft Model--icann.org: The Technical Study Group on Access to Non-Public Registration Data is developing a detailed draft of the Technical Model for Non-Public Registration Data. "... In the coming weeks, the team members, working together with ICANN org representatives, will further develop the draft Technical Model in order to share it with the community before heading to Kobe. During our face-to-face meeting, we also discussed how to present our work outside of the ICANN community, including to the European Commission. When we finish our work on the Technical Model after Kobe, we will send our report to ICANN President and CEO Göran Marby. We look forward to sharing these discussions with you in more detail at ICANN64 and invite you to a community engagement session we are planning ..."

3) Names, Domains & Trademarks
graphic "Names, Domains & Trademarks" ©2017 DomainMondo.com
a. Google Does Domaining Like Big Time Extortion | i-programmer.info: "Google Domains has the rights to the .dev Top Level Domain and intends to make as much money from it as possible - $11,500 just for early access to the scramble to register the most desirable names." 

b. Trademark case of Booking.com v. USPTO (pdf) embed below,  decided Feb 4, 2019 (45 days for Petition for En Banc Rehearing). See also Unprotectable Generic Trademarks + Top-Level Domains = Protectable Trademarks--jdsupra.com, and Fourth Circuit Confirms Booking.com is Protectable But Company Must Pay the USPTO’s Fees on Appeal--jdsupra.com.

4) ICYMI Internet Domain News 
graphic "ICYMI Internet Domain News" ©2017 DomainMondo.com
Personal Data, Data Protection, Data Privacy, Access to Data:
  • OpenSRS’ Tiered Access Directory: a look at the numbers--opensrs.com: "We have received more than 2100 data access requests since our Tiered Access system started last May, and of these requests ... 65% of all requests came on behalf of a single requestor; only 21% of these requests resulted in the provision of data, as the majority did not provide sufficient legitimate purpose, nor did the requestor respond to our request for more information. Perhaps surprisingly, 70% of data access requests are not fulfilled because the requestor did not respond to Tucows’ requests for additional information ..."
  • Patients, health data experts accuse Facebook of exposing personal info--thehill.com.
  • Access  to Data: What’s the Emergency? Keeping International Requests for Law Enforcement Access Secure and Safe for Internet Users--eff.org.

Copyright Law Versus Internet Culture--eff.org.

India: Not just porn, Indian users say telecoms are blocking access to many websites. Most of the complaints have come from Indians using Jio connections, followed by Airtel--scroll.in. See also India Proposes Chinese-Style Internet Censorship--NYTimes.com.

Press freedom organisations urge Nigeria to keep internet on during election period--ifex.org

5) Most Read this past week on DomainMondo.com: 
graphic "Domain Mondo" ©2017 DomainMondo.com



-- John Poole, Editor • Domain Mondo 

feedback & comments via twitter @DomainMondo


DISCLAIMER

2019-01-13

News Review | ICANN EPDP Face-to-Face Meeting Jan 16-18 Toronto

graphic "News Review" ©2016 DomainMondo.com
Domain Mondo's weekly internet domain news review (NR 2019-01-13 with analysis and opinion: Features •  1)  ICANN EPDP Face-to-Face Meeting Jan 16-18,   2) Other ICANN news: a. ICANN correspondence re: GDPR and .COM, b. new gTLD .AMAZON, 3) Names, Domains & TMs: a. Global DNS Hijacking, b.New gTLDs review and 2019 predictions, 4) ICYMI: China & Censorship, Net Neutrality, Cybersecurity, Election Security, 5) Most Read.

1) ICANN EPDP Face-to-Face (F2F) Meeting, Toronto, Jan 16-18
 ICANN EPDP
 EPDP_F2F_Toronto
EPDP F2F Meeting Wiki Page* Jan 16-18:  Toronto's time zone is EST. Agenda embed below--note that Friday's session will reportedly begin early at 7:30am EST:

Observers may use Adobe Connect, or audiocast via browser / app. Links: EPDP Initial Report (pdf); comments to the Initial Report; Public Comment Review Tool PCRT; GNSO Council EPDP page and updates; links to EPDP meeting transcripts and recordings are on the GNSO calendar. Other EPDP links: wiki; mail list; action items; Temp Spec; EPDP Charter (pdf); Data Elements Workbooks (pdf), packet (pdf) of small team agreements.

UPDATES: F2F Day 1 (Jan 16) notes and action items (pdf); ICANN memo re Independent Controllership (pdf) discussed Thursday, Jan 17, 2019, at 4pm EST at the Toronto F2F, by counsel for ICANN org. F2F Day 2 (Jan 17) notes and action items (pdf), F2F Day 3 (Jan 18) notes and action items (pdf).

*On Saturday, Jan 12, ICANN staff sent a survey to EPDP members--"in order to help inform the EPDP Team Leadership's development of the agenda for the F2F meeting in Toronto" asking each "group" to "voluntarily rank the different purposes and recommendations ... currently slated for EPDP Team review,"--excerpt below:
Please rank in order of priority for discussion at the F2F meeting (with #1 being the most important topic to be addressed F2F)
  • Purpose 1 - Establish the rights of a Registered Name Holder
  • Purpose 2 - Maintaining SSR through enabling of lawful access
  • Purpose 7 - Registry Validation Requirements
  • Recommendation #2 - Commitment to consider a system for Standardized Access to non-public Registration Data
  • Recommendation #3 - Requirements related to accuracy
  • Recommendation #4 - Data elements to be collected by Registrars (incl. Question #2) (Data Elements Workbooks)
  • Recommendation #5 - Data elements to be transferred from Registrars to Registries
  • Recommendation #7 - Contractual Compliance
  • Recommendation #8 - Redaction (Consent)
  • Recommendation #9 - Organization field
  • Recommendation #10 - Email communication
  • Recommendation #11 - Data retention
  • Recommendation #12 - Reasonable access
  • Recommendation #13 - Controller Agreement
  • Recommendation #14 - Responsible parties
  • Question 3 - Geo/Legal vs. Natural
  • Additional purposes suggested.

EPDP Highlights week ending Friday Jan 11, 2019:
  • ICANN org "retained the law firm of Bird & Bird [twobirds.com] as an additional expert to help advise on GDPR matters, including advising the EPDP Team ... The engagement will be led by Ruth Boardman ..." --source: legal mail list Jan 10, 2019.
  • Thomas Rickert (Attorney - ISPCP) email Jan 11, 2019: "Given the time constraints we are under, I think it would make sense to have someone from Bird & Bird on the ground in Toronto to coach us as needed. Not sure this is asked for too much, but I think we would hugely benefit from that, be able to sit with the advisor in personal talks to answer questions and also to avoid that we build mistakes into our revisions of the report. That could expedite our journey towards a final report and hopefully consensus."
  • Small Teams' Conclusions (pdf) (meetings Jan 8-10), via EPDP Chair email Jan 12, 2019.
  • Marc Anderson (Verisign - RySG) email Jan 10, 2019: "Given that we are in the middle of our review of public comments and still have the face to face meeting next week, I feel somewhat bad asking this, however February 1st is 3 weeks from tomorrow. Given the timeline, I'm requesting an initial draft of the final report for working group members to begin to review and provide feedback on. The initial report was very much written for its intended purpose of updating the community on the progress we have made and soliciting input on the issues we are grappling with so I'm assuming some amount of rework will be necessary. I'm also mindful that the bar of consensus on final (phase 1) policy recommendations to the GNSO council is higher that of good enough for the initial report. The sooner we can see the draft and start working against that the better and more likely we are to meet our timelines."
  • Stephanie Perrin (NCSG Chair) email Jan 10, 2019: "I totally support this request" [request above from Marc Anderson].
More info in last week's News Review | ICANN EPDP Timeline: Final Report Due Feb 1, 2019.

2) Other ICANN News
graphic "ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers"
a. ICANN Correspondence:
07 Jan 2019 Letter from ICANN CEO Göran Marby to Laura Flannery (pdf) (see above) re: ICANN Contractual Compliance Data Processing Activities and the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). See also Letter from Laura Flannery (pdf) and Letter from Göran Marby (pdf) to Helen Dixon and Willem Debeuckelaere.

08 Jan 2019 Letter from ICANN GDD VP Cyrus Namazi to Zak Muscovitch (pdf) (below) re: NTIA and the .COM Registry Agreement:
See also 16 Nov 2018 Letter from Zak Muscovitch to Göran Marby, Cyrus Namazi, and the ICANN Board (pdf). Editor's note: Neither Verisign $VRSN Nor ICANN Owns gTLD .COM a Global Public Resource RFC1591.

b. New gTLD .AMAZON: Recommendation (pdf) Of The Board Accountability Mechanisms
Committee (BAMC) Reconsideration Request 18-10, 21 December 2018:
"BAMC acknowledges that Request 18-10 reflects a difference in interpretation by the Requestor of the Resolution, and thus, the BAMC recommends that the Board reiterates that the Resolution was taken with the clear intention to grant the President and CEO the authority to progress the facilitation process between the ACTO member states and the Amazon corporation with the goal of helping the involved parties reach a mutually agreed solution, but in the event they are unable to do so the Board will make a decision at ICANN 64 on the next steps regarding the potential delegation of .AMAZON and related top-level domains." (p. 5 of 27 pages).

3) Names, Domains & Trademarks
graphic "Names, Domains & Trademarks" ©2017 DomainMondo.com
a. Global DNS Hijacking Campaign: DNS Record Manipulation at Scale--fireeye.com: "affected dozens of domains belonging to government, telecommunications and internet infrastructure entities across the Middle East and North Africa, Europe and North America. While we do not currently link this activity to any tracked group, initial research suggests the actor or actors responsible have a nexus to Iran."

b. New gTLDs review and 2019 predictions: 
  • "My First Ever Review of all Top 10 New GTLD’s. PLUS The List of 350++ New GTLD extensions that will go BYE BYE!! The Birdie in the Mine is DEAD!!"--ricksblog.com 5 Jan 2019.
  • "A prediction: new TLD registrations will drop in 2019"--domainnamewire.com 9 Jan 2019.

4) ICYMI Internet Domain News 
graphic "ICYMI Internet Domain News" ©2017 DomainMondo.com
China's year of censorship--theguardian.com. See also: Twitter Users in China Face Detention and Threats in New Beijing Crackdown--NYTimes.com.

Net Neutrality: FCC Chairman Pai Statement on Failure of CRA Attempting to Overturn FCC's Restoring Internet Freedom Order--fcc.gov.

Cybersecurity: National Counterintelligence And Security Center (US) Launches Campaign To Help Private Industry Guard Against Threats From Nation State Actors--dni.gov.

Election Security: Democrats in Alabama's US Senate Election Used Russia-Style 'False Flag' Facebook Ad Campaign Against the Republican Candidate--zerohedge.com.

5) Most Read this past week on DomainMondo.com: 
graphic "Domain Mondo" ©2017 DomainMondo.com
-- John Poole, Editor • Domain Mondo 

feedback & comments via twitter @DomainMondo


DISCLAIMER

2018-12-30

News Review | Six Questions for 2019 & Twelve for 2018 Answered

graphic "News Review" ©2016 DomainMondo.com
Domain Mondo's weekly internet domain news review (NR 2018-12-30 with analysis and opinion: Features •  1) Six Questions for 2019 & Twelve for 2018 Answered,  2)ICANN news: a. EPDP Meeting Jan 3, b. Public Comment Periods Closing in January, 3) GoDaddy $GDDY and more, 4) 2018 in Review, 5) Most Read.

1)  Six Questions for 2019 & Twelve for 2018 Answered
Six Questions for 2019:
1. New gTLD .WEB 
Editor's note: For $135 million, ICANN will do whatever you want.

2. New gTLD .AMAZON: Bezos vs Brazil et al
Editor's note: when ICANN's current CEO was caught in his own lies, things went south.

3. New gTLD .AFRICA Litigation
Will DCA Trust Finally Get Its 'Day in Court'?
Editor's note: another mess Fadi Chehade & Akram Atallah left behind.

4. GDPR, ICANN Temp Spec & EPDP, WHOIS Access
Standardized Access, Unified Access?
Editor's note: the dysfunctional EPDP grinds on, but ICANN Org has a different agenda.

5. ICANN New gTLD Auction Proceeds
Who Will Be the Big 'Money Grab' Winners?
Editor's note: At ICANN, "It's ALL about the money."

6. IGF 2019 Berlin  25-29 November
Action Or Just More Talk?
Editor's note:the fourteenth Annual Meeting of the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) will be hosted by the Government of Germany in Berlin from 25 to 29 November 2019. The first face-to-face 2019 Open Consultations and MAG meeting takes place on 28-30 January 2019 at the Palais des Nations in Geneva, Switzerland. A Call for Issues has been published and submissions are due Thursday 24 January 2019. UPDATE: Among the issues already submitted in the Category: Evolution of Internet Governance:
#22 Quels solutions préconisez vous pour l'évolution de la gouvernance de l'Internet? [What solutions do you recommend for the evolution of Internet governance?]
#37 A middle ground between the vested-interest capture of multi-stakeholderism and government capture of multi-lateralism is badly needed. How can IGF stimulate such innovation? Comment submitted with this issue below (highlighting added)--


The 12 Questions for 2018 Answered:
  1. Domain Names: Will 2018 Be As Bad As 2017 or Worse, particularly for new gTLDs (new generic top-level domains)? New gTLDs No Longer In Decline, But Hardly Healthy
  2. Will the Internet Society (ISOC) find its way in 2018? New Leadership, But Jury Still Out
  3. What's Next for Internet Net Neutrality? More of the Same, See You In Court
  4. Should the Internet Governance Forum be allowed to die? Depends on What Happens in Berlin, November, 2019
  5. China's 5th World Internet Conference in 2018: Even Bigger, Broader, and Bolder? No
  6. Was ICANN ready for EU GDPR compliance on 25 May 2018? No, It Was A Train Wreck
  7. Will NTIA extend the Cooperative Agreement with Verisign on or before November 30, 2018, and specifically, what will happen to .com pricing? Extended But Verisign Got More $$$
  8. Will ICANN "roll the root zone KSK" in 2018 or "break the internet" in the process? Delayed But Everything Turned Out OK
  9. What will be the outcomes of ICANN litigation in 2018? Ruby Glen (Donuts) Lost vs ICANN, ICANN Lost vs EPAG (Tucows), For Everything Else See 2019 Above
  10. What will the U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division do about new gTLD .WEB, Verisign and ICANN? Nothing, File Closed, No Action
  11. What will happen to the ICANN Reviews, including the still suspended SSR2? SSR2 Back In Business, As For The Rest, Nobody Cares
  12. Will the global internet community begin taking steps to reform or replace ICANN in 2018, including at PP-18, ITU Plenipotentiary Conference 2018, Dubai, UAE 29 Oct - 16 Nov 2018, or establish a new root? Only Macron at IGF2018 in Paris Gave A Glimmer Of Hope

2) ICANN News
a. EPDP Meeting Thursday, Jan 3, 2019, at 14:00 UTC (9am EST). Observers use Adobe Connect, or browser or app audiocast. Resources: EPDP Initial Report (pdf) and comments. 

Editor's note: The following quotes from the chat transcript (embed below) sum up the dysfunctional EPDP meeting on January 3, 2019:
Stephanie Perrin (NCSG): (09:37) "Let us ask the legal counsel to explain how one goes about elucidating purposes of processing. It is a bit late, but we are a long way from bringing this thing home, in my opinion. Better late than never."
Stephanie Perrin (NCSG): (09:59) "My comment about seeking legal advice, was to try to explain to us what this process is. We do not have a sound methodology, people are all over the map, in my view because they do not really understand what we are trying to do."
Thursday meeting agenda, EPDP leadership's note (pdf), meeting transcript (pdf); Adobe recording, PCRT (Public Comment Review Tool), notes & action items, and Chat transcript (pdf) embed below:

GNSO Council EPDP page and updates; links to all EPDP meetings' transcripts and recordings on the GNSO calendar; EPDP working group wiki, mail list, action items, Temp Spec, EPDP Charter (pdf), Data Elements Workbooks (pdf).

Editor's note: comments by the GNSO's CPH (Contracted Parties House, i.e., Registrars & gTLD Registry Operators) embed further below, excerpts:
The EPDP Team must limit its focus to the charter if it is to complete its work by the anticipated February 1, 2019 Final Report publication date.
Several working methods have impeded the EPDP Team’s progress. Certain EPDP Team members spent a disproportionate amount of time (including during almost every meeting) discussing -- or trying to discuss -- access. These access discussions and efforts were premature, diverted the EPDP Team’s attention from its critical prerequisite work, and negatively impacted the Team’s progress. The Initial Report reflects this diversion and lack of progress. The EPDP Team has a responsibility to the ICANN community to be diligent about remaining “in scope;” otherwise, the Team risks not completing its work by February 1, 2019.
The EPDP Team has neither agreed upon – nor in many cases even conducted – significant foundational work including defining a minimum data set, performing a data audit, and defining roles and responsibilities of parties. Further, the Purposes put forth as Recommendations in the Initial Report, only stand on the analysis conducted in the workbooks which are overtly framed as ICANN Purposes only.
It is not appropriate for any PDP WG to propose new or materially different policy recommendations in its Final Report without providing the community an opportunity to comment. This is especially true for a subject as complex and important as GDPR compliance in the domain name registration ecosystem.
The Initial Report itself raises concerns. The lack of agreement behind the individual recommendations is clear. The lack of consensus calls is clear ... Although the Initial Report is written to suggest that the EPDP Team developed the recommendations, the CPH understands that it did not. To the contrary, ICANN Staff developed the specific language of the recommendations, many of which could not be tracked back to specific EPDP Team decisions or discussions. The timing of the Initial Report (and the time diverted to access discussions) left little time for the EPDP Team to properly deliberate on all recommendations, the data elements workbooks, or the Initial Report text itself. While the CPH understands the tremendous time pressure the EPDP Team faces, it is important for the integrity of the PDP process that working group members not be surprised by Initial Report recommendations, be able to trace the origin of recommendations, and have adequate time to sufficiently deliberate those recommendations. In addition, the EPDP Team must focus on creating a report that lends itself to a clear, implementable Consensus Policy. The Initial Report is simply too ambiguous. (emphasis added)

CPH Comment embed in full below:

b. ICANN Public Comment periods ending in January, 2019
Note: dates subject to change by ICANN org. Closing time is 23.59 UTC on each date shown:

3) Names, Domains & Trademarks
graphic "Names, Domains & Trademarks" ©2017 DomainMondo.com
a. GoDaddy $GDDY Citi analyst Nicholas Jones has given the stock a Buy rating and $82 target, citing GoDaddy's healthy FCF (free cash flow) and capital allocation strategy. Jones also thinks GoDaddy can increase ARPU (average revenue per user) to $230+ by 2029 from about $150 this year. Source: Bloomberg First Word.

b. Domain Registrar can be held liable for pirate site, German Court rules--torrentfreak.com 24 Dec 2018.

c. The web really isn’t worldwide – every country has different access--theconversation.com.

d. How Much of the Internet Is Fake? Turns Out, a Lot of It, Actually--nymag.com.

4) ICYMI Internet Domain News: 2018 in Review 
graphic "ICYMI Internet Domain News" ©2017 DomainMondo.com


InternetGovernance.org:


e. An Access Model for Whois Data that Respects Registrants Rights

f. The Looming Battle over the GDPR and the Purpose of Whois in ICANN

g. The 2006 Definition of Whois Purpose: Case study of the “bad old days” in ICANN: “... everyone in the task force agrees the purpose of Whois is to provide a system for a given domain name to be looked up and produce a set of contact information ..."  (emphasis added)

5) Most Read this past week on DomainMondo.com: 
graphic "Domain Mondo" ©2017 DomainMondo.com

-- John Poole, Editor • Domain Mondo 

feedback & comments via twitter @DomainMondo


DISCLAIMER

Domain Mondo archive