Showing posts with label ICANN Board of Directors. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ICANN Board of Directors. Show all posts

2016-08-19

ICANN Quarterly Stakeholder Call, Q4 FY2016, Presentation Slides

ICANN held its FY16 Q4 (ending June 30, 2016), Quarterly Stakeholder Call, on August 18, 2016. There were no surprises in the reports presented, which covered the IANA stewardship transition, global engagement activities, policy updates, and financial reports:
  • President & CEO Overview- Göran Marby, President & CEO (10 min)
  • Board Update - Steve Crocker, Chair, ICANN Board of Directors (5 min)
  • Policy Update - Bart Boswinkel for David Olive, Sr. VP Policy Development Support; Adiel Akplogan, VP Technical Engagement (10 min)
  • Management Update - David Conrad, Chief Technology Officer (15 min)
  • Financial Update - Xavier Calvez, Chief Financial Officer (10 min)
The recording of the call, the presentation (embed below), and transcripts, are (or will be) posted on the ICANN website.

Highlights from the presentation slides:

ICANN Q4 FY2016 Stakeholder Call Presentation (pdf)(slides), 18 August 2016 (embed below):


feedback & comments via twitter @DomainMondo


DISCLAIMER

2016-02-14

IANA Stewardship Transition, New ICANN CCWG Accountability Timeline

UPDATE 23 Feb 2016--CCWG-Accountability Resolves ICANN Board's Concerns with Threshholds, Final Proposal Sent to Chartering Organizations for Approval--Chartering Organization Approval - Final Report (23 February) - Enhancing ICANN Accountability--

After a 1:00-3:00 a.m. ET meeting today (Feb 23), at which CCWG-Accountability members and participants were polled, the CCWG Co-Chairs announced "broad support" for removal of the language which caused the Board's concerns (see Steve Crocker's post below), "As such, the updated Paragraph 72 [in Annex 02: https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=58723723&preview=/58723723/58725520/Annex%2002%20-%20FINAL.pdf] language is:

"The CCWG-Accountability also recommends that in a situation where the GAC may not participate as a Decisional Participant because the Community Power is proposed to be used to challenge the Board’s implementation of GAC consensus advice and the threshold is set at four in support, the power will still be validly exercised if three are in support and no more than one objects, with the following exception: Where the power to be exercised is recalling the entire Board for implementing GAC advice, the reduced threshold would apply only either after an IRP has found that, in implementing GAC advice, the Board acted inconsistently with the ICANN Bylaws, or (1) if the IRP is not available to challenge the Board action in question. If the Empowered Community has brought such an IRP and does not prevail, the Empowered Community may not exercise its power to recall the entire the Board solely on the basis of the matter decided by the IRP. It may, however, exercise that power based on other grounds."

"... We will now proceed and send the finalized report, without (2), to the Chartering Organizations for approval."--CCWG Co-Chairs Tue Feb 23 18:13:48 UTC 2016.

The Chartering Organizations will have 15 days (through March 9, 2016) to approve the Final Report so it may be submitted to the ICANN Board for transmittal to the NTIA on March 10, 2016 (at ICANN55), see updated timeline below.

UPDATE 20 Feb 2016: CCWG-Accountability Final Proposal further delayed--a "glitch" in the timeline process occurred on Friday, February 19, 2016--posting to the CCWG maillist on Saturday, Feb 20, at 00:19:15 UTC 2016:

Dear all,
As you are aware, we intended to publish our Final Report today (19 February 2016) for Chartering Organization consideration. We are ready to do so, except for one issue where we would like to consider options as a full group.  
There is, still, ongoing discussion on the issue of thresholds for Board removal in Recommendation #2, which raised concerns in our report after we came to a compromise on Board consideration of GAC Advice (Recommendation #11). Since then, we have tried to propose compromise text that would be acceptable by different groups (c.f. the 12 February and 17 February drafts, posted at https://community.icann.org/x/iw2AAw).  
We received comments on this issue, and in some cases, minority statements, from members and participants in the ALAC, GAC, GNSO, and the Board. Earlier today, ICANN Chairman, Steve Crocker, posted a *note [see below], apparently on behalf of the ICANN Board, outlining Board concerns with the latest attempt at compromise text proposed on 17 February: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/2016-February/011056.html.
While these last minute interventions are deeply disappointing for those of us who worked extremely hard, within the group and within their respective communities, to build bridges and promote compromise, our main target and duty remains to achieve a stable level of consensus, respecting the bottom-up, multistakeholder nature of the process.
It is fortunate that the Board provided this input before we published the report, since it enables us to assess the potential consequences of a Board disagreement later in the process.
We believe this issue must be discussed before sending our Final Report to Chartering Organizations. At the very least, we would like the opportunity to discuss a way forward and process as full group on next Tuesday’s CCWG-Accountability call at 06:00 UTC. There are many options and directions the group can take at this stage, each with different implications and considerations, and these options should be discussed as a group.
Until the Tuesday call, let’s keep open channels of communication on our mailing list and work towards a solution. We will also reach out to the Chartering Organizations to inform them of the change in our schedule.
As co-chairs, we renew our call upon every Member, upon every Participant, our call upon community leaders especially in the ICANN Board, in the GNSO and in the GAC to step away from confronting each other, to engage constructively and recognize each other’s value to the multistakeholder model. If you believe that the multistakeholder model can deliver, now is the time to act accordingly.
Thank you,
Thomas, León, Mathieu
CCWG-Accountability Co-Chairs
(emphasis added)

*Posting by ICANN Chairman Steve Crocker on Friday, Feb 19, 2016:

CCWG Colleagues, 
The Board has a serious and continued concern about the issues being raised that may result in the reduction of the GAC’s ability to participate in community decision making. This is most noticeable in the question of thresholds for board removal, however this is not an issue about removal or even thresholds, it is one part of the community being (or perceiving that it is being) sidelined. The Board’s concerns with this issue are not about Board removal, but about maintaining the balanced multistakeholder model. 

The Board is against any changes to the long established equilibrium and fairness among the different stakeholders within ICANN. The Board has long supported a threshold of four participants for Board removal in the ultimate escalation method proposed by the CCWG. Selecting one portion of the ICANN community and removing them from the equation - just through the ability to say that the community is unhappy with the acceptance of GAC advice that is within ICANN’s bylaws - raises significant concerns about how the multistakeholder model, and the ultimate stability of ICANN as an organization, can be maintained. This carved out exception undercuts the established role of governments within the multi stakeholder process, and could introduce new issues with the acceptance of ICANN’s model undermining the work of the CCWG. 
We understand that there are concerns with this path from within other parts of ICANN community, including members of the GAC and ALAC. The best course, in our opinion, would be a careful and objective discussion of the whole matter of how advice from ALL parties is appropriately considered within ICANN. If there is a graceful way to remove this matter from the immediate pressure of the deadline of submitting this proposal and make it a priority matter for either the implementation phase or Work Stream 2, we think there will be a solution which is genuinely good for everyone. 

We encourage you to share the CCWG’s proposal with the Chartering Organizations while the dialog on this outstanding point continues. 

Thank you, 
Steve Crocker Chair, ICANN Board of Directors


IANA Stewardship Transition Proposal Process
IANA Stewardship Transition--new ICANN CCWG-Accountability Timeline--

Note: There is no public comment period for the final draft proposal -- You can view the full final draft of the proposal on the CCWG's Wiki (https://community.icann.org/x/iw2AAw). The documents are displayed in a table format, you can download each section as you read through, or download a zip file of all documents by going to the "download all" link at the bottom of the page. Also note "the compromise on Board removal liability mitigation in Recommendation 4 has not been properly reflected" as of February 12 and the CCWG Co-chairs indicated it will be corrected on or before February 18. UPDATE: The timeline has been further revised as indicated below:
  • 12 Feb — Report sent by 22:00 UTC to the CCWG Leadership Team and CCWG Legal Counsel for review with all materials posted on the Wiki (https://community.icann.org/x/iw2AAw) for everyone to view.
  • 15 Feb — Report updated (if needed) to incorporate edits from CCWG Leadership Team and Legal.
  • 16 Feb 17 Feb — Report sent to CCWG for 48-hour review (and posted on the Wiki at https://community.icann.org/x/iw2AAw).
  • 17 Feb 18 Feb at 17:00 UTC – Minority statements due for incorporation into Final Report.
  • 18 Feb 19 Feb further DELAYED (see UPDATE above) Final Report sent to Chartering Organizations* for consideration and approval on February 23, 3016.
  • 25 Feb – CWG-Stewardship sign-off letter delivered to Chartering Organizations, then to ICG.
  • By 9 Mar at the latest** – Sign-off on Final Report by Chartering Organizations* at ICANN55 in Marrakech (in time for the Board to consider).
  • 10 Mar – Public ICANN Board of Directors Meeting (final day of ICANN55, Marrakech), hand over from ICANN Board to NTIA.
**the Chartering Organizations will have 15 days (Feb 24-Mar 9) to read, review, discuss and approve the CCWG-Accountability final draft proposal on Work Stream 1 (WS1) enhancements to ICANN accountability necessary in order to transition the IANA stewardship from the U.S. government to ICANN.

*Chartering Organizations:
GNSO Generic Names Supporting Organization
ALAC At-Large Advisory Committee
ccNSO Country Code Names Supporting Organisation
GAC Governmental Advisory Committee
ASO Address Supporting Organization
SSAC Security and Stability Advisory Committee

CCWG-Accountability Meetings schedule here | online via Adobe Connect (open to silent "observers"icann.adobeconnect.com/accountability/

CCWG ACCT Meeting #84Tuesday, 16 February06:00 - 08:00 UTC
CCWG ACCT Meeting #85Tuesday, 23 February06:00 - 08:00 UTC

Time conversion 06:00 UTC is 1:00 AM ET (US)

A look back:  CCWG-Accountability Presentation - 8 Dec 2014:



See also on Domain Mondo:



DISCLAIMER

2015-10-06

IANA Transition: ICANN Board Also Rules Out CCWG Designator Model

UPDATE: CCWG-Accountability Attorneys: ICANN Already Uses 'Designator Model' Oct 13, 2015
* * * * *
In a posting to the CCWG-Accountability mail list on Monday evening, October 5, 2015, just hours before a scheduled CCWG-Accountability meeting, ICANN Board Chair Steve Crocker announced that the ICANN Board of Directors' "concerns on the Sole Member model [also] still apply to a Designator model"--meaning that the ICANN Board does not support either the CCWG's proposed Single Member Model (SMM or CMSM) nor its alternative, the Designator model. Below is the full posting of Steve Crocker:

CCWG,

We appreciate the continued work that the CCWG is doing to consider the public comments received on its second draft report.  Following the Los Angeles F2F we have heard suggestions that a Designator model relying on California statutes may be a replacement for the Sole Member model that was in the second draft report.

To be clear, the concerns that the Board raised on the Sole Member model still apply to a Designator model.  The Designator model still introduces a new legal structure with powers that are intrinsically beyond the structure we have been using.  We understand that many believe it is possible to constrain these powers in order to provide established protections, accountability and thresholds: This is unproven territory and will require more detail and time to understand and test the impact on our bedrock multistakeholder balance. 

Further, it is unclear that this would represent the full multistakeholder community because we do not know yet which SO/ACs will join now or later.  Moreover, the same community accountability issues present in the Sole Member are present in the Designator model.

Steve del Bianco’s constructive suggestion over the weekend that the Board could commit to a future governance structure review triggered by key factors seems like a good path forward.  This can be enshrined in a new fundamental bylaw that would require the holding of a future governance structure review if SOs and ACs agree to kick off that review.

We are all in complete agreement on the objective of enforcement of the five community powers, with new/stronger mechanisms for board removal if/when necessary.  Let’s focus on finalizing the details on these consensus elements to enable implementation and a successful transition. 

Steve Crocker
for the ICANN Board of Directors
(emphasis added)

See also on Domain Mondo:




DISCLAIMER

2015-09-22

Only 19 of 90 Comments Support ICANN Accountability Proposal Overall

Contrary to recent representations and "spin"(pdf) from the ICANN CCWG-Accountability co-Chairs, the second public comment period resulted in less than a majority, and much less than a consensus of community support and endorsement overall, for the most recent CCWG proposal, with most comments raising questions and concerns--see excerpts below from the full pdf slide presentation which can be found as an attachment on the CCWG mail list here: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/2015-September/005493.html--


All comments may be read here: http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-ccwg-accountability-03aug15/. The CCWG-Accountability group is scheduled to meet with the ICANN Board of Directors this coming Friday and Saturday, September 25-26, in Los Angeles.

The CCWG-Accountability process dealing with enhancing ICANN accountability is one part of the NTIA requirements for the IANA Stewardship Transition, the other part being the ICG process now also underway.

See also on Domain Mondo:




DISCLAIMER

2015-06-24

ICANN President and CEO Search Committee

The ICANN President and CEO Search Committee has been formed by the ICANN Board of Directors pursuant to a motion passed at its meeting on June 21, 2015:

Whereas, Fadi Chehadé has announced that he intends to conclude his service as ICANN's President and CEO in March 2016 and the Board is tasked with selecting Mr. Chehadé's replacement.

Whereas, the Board has determined to establish a President and CEO Search Committee, and has identified the following Board members to serve as members of that Committee, all of whom have stated without reservation that they are not a candidate for the position of President and CEO, and will not accept such a position even if offered:

Rinalia Abdul Rahim
Cherine Chalaby
Steve Crocker
Chris Disspain
Markus Kummer
Ram Mohan
Ray Plzak
George Sadowsky (Chair)

Resolved (2015.06.21.03), the Board hereby approves the establishment of the President and CEO Search Committee, and approves the recommended membership and leadership of that Committee as identified above.

Rationale for Resolution 2015.06.21.03
Fadi Chehadé has announced that he intends to conclude his service as ICANN's President and Chief Executive Officer (CEO) in March 2016. Accordingly, the Board is now tasked with selecting Mr. Chehadé's replacement. The establishment of a temporary Board Committee will allow the Board to more easily coordinate this process with regular reporting to the Board as a whole. It is important to begin this process now, to help ensure that there is timely succession of ICANN's President and CEO, which will assist the organization in maintaining its work in overseeing the security and the stability of the domain name system (DNS). The establishment of this temporary Board Committee will not have a financial impact on ICANN, although resources are likely to be required at later points throughout the search process. This action will not have a negative impact on the DNS.

Establishing the President and CEO Search Committee is an Organizational Administrative Function that does not require public comment. (source: ICANN)

Note: ICANN 53 Session Thursday: 12:45 to 13:45 ART CEO Succession Process Libertador AB
See also:



2015-05-21

ICANN President and CEO Fadi Chehadé to Leave ICANN March 2016

ICANN_101712_1348
ICANN CEO Fadi Chehadé
source: icann.org
[Note: see UPDATES below]
ICANN President and CEO Fadi Chehadé has informed the ICANN Board of Directors that he will be concluding his tenure in March 2016 to move into a new career in the private sector outside the Domain Name Industry.

At the request of the Board, Chehadé will be available to work closely with ICANN after March 2016 to support the transition to a new leader, as well as to advise the Board on any issue they require including the implementation of the IANA Stewardship Transition from the US Government to ICANN and the technical operating community.

"I want to thank Fadi for his strong commitment," said Dr. Stephen Crocker, Chair of the Board of Directors. I am very confident that with Fadi's continued leadership and ICANN's very experienced management team who have the breadth to ensure that ICANN continues to manage its key responsibilities effectively, that the organization's work will proceed smoothly."

"I am deeply committed to working with the Board, our staff, and our community to continue ICANN's mission as we still have much to accomplish," said Chehadé. "During the remaining 10 months of my tenure, it's business-as-usual. My priority remains to continue strengthening ICANN's operations and services to the global community." (source: ICANN)

Last year the ICANN Board extended the contract of  Fadi Chehadé by two years, to run until 30 June 2017, and increased his base salary by 12.5 percent. Chehadé joined ICANN in late 2012 and is a citizen of Egypt, Lebanon, and the United States. He was born in Beirut, Lebanon, to Egyptian parents and left the then war-torn country in 1980 at the age of 18. He speaks fluent Arabic, English, French, and Italian. Before joining ICANN as its President and CEO in late 2012, he served as Chief Executive Officer of Vocado LLC, a U.S. firm that is a provider of cloud-based software for the administration of educational institutions.

UPDATES: see What Caused ICANN President and CEO Fadi Chehadé To Quit? and

Statement of Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Communications and Information and NTIA Administrator Lawrence E. Strickling on ICANN CEO Fadi Chehade’s announcement that he plans to leave the organization next year:

“Fadi Chehade has served as CEO of ICANN with tireless dedication, and I greatly appreciate his ongoing commitment to improve the accountability and transparency of the organization. NTIA remains committed to the responsible and timely transition of our stewardship of the Internet Domain Name System consistent with the conditions that NTIA outlined in 2014. A successful transition does not depend on the leadership of a single individual, but rather the engagement of the global multistakeholder community working collaboratively to ensure that the Internet remains open, secure, and resilient. I urge the community to remain focused on the important task of developing a transition proposal, including enhanced accountability mechanisms, that fully meets our conditions and can be implemented in a responsible and timely manner.”


2015-03-04

Affirmation of Commitments, ICANN Board, Global Public Interest

The global multistakeholder community whose interests (the global Public Interest) the ICANN Board of Directors ultimately represents, adopted the Affirmation of Commitments together with the the United States Department of Commerce, on September 30, 2009. Public Interest is mentioned no fewer than 5 times--below are excerpts--full document at the link below:

Affirmation of Commitments - US and ICANN: 1. This document constitutes an Affirmation of Commitments (Affirmation) by the United States Department of Commerce ("DOC") and the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers ("ICANN"), a not-for-profit corporation. In recognition of the conclusion of the Joint Project Agreement and to institutionalize and memorialize the technical coordination of the Internet's domain name and addressing system (DNS), globally by a private sector led organization, the parties agree as follows:
....
3. This document affirms key commitments by DOC and ICANN, including commitments to: (a) ensure that decisions made related to the global technical coordination of the DNS are made in the public interest and are accountable and transparent; (b) preserve the security, stability and resiliency of the DNS; (c) promote competition, consumer trust, and consumer choice in the DNS marketplace; and (d) facilitate international participation in DNS technical coordination.

4. DOC affirms its commitment to a multi-stakeholder, private sector led, bottom-up policy development model for DNS technical coordination that acts for the benefit of global Internet users. A private coordinating process, the outcomes of which reflect the public interest, is best able to flexibly meet the changing needs of the Internet and of Internet users. ICANN and DOC recognize that there is a group of participants that engage in ICANN's processes to a greater extent than Internet users generally. To ensure that its decisions are in the public interest, and not just the interests of a particular set of stakeholders, ICANN commits to perform and publish analyses of the positive and negative effects of its decisions on the public, including any financial impact on the public, and the positive or negative impact (if any) on the systemic security, stability and resiliency of the DNS.
....
5. DOC recognizes the importance of global Internet users being able to use the Internet in their local languages and character sets, and endorses the rapid introduction of internationalized country code top level domain names (ccTLDs), provided related security, stability and resiliency issues are first addressed. Nothing in this document is an expression of support by DOC of any specific plan or proposal for the implementation of new generic top level domain names (gTLDs) or is an expression by DOC of a view that the potential consumer benefits of new gTLDs outweigh the potential costs.

6. DOC also affirms the United States Government's commitment to ongoing participation in ICANN's Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC). DOC recognizes the important role of the GAC with respect to ICANN decision-making and execution of tasks and of the effective consideration by ICANN of GAC input on the public policy aspects of the technical coordination of the Internet DNS.

7. ICANN commits to adhere to transparent and accountable budgeting processes, fact-based policy development, cross-community deliberations, and responsive consultation procedures that provide detailed explanations of the basis for decisions, including how comments have influenced the development of policy consideration, and to publish each year an annual report that sets out ICANN's progress against ICANN's bylaws, responsibilities, and strategic and operating plans. In addition, ICANN commits to provide a thorough and reasoned explanation of decisions taken, the rationale thereof and the sources of data and information on which ICANN relied.

8. ICANN affirms its commitments to: (a) maintain the capacity and ability to coordinate the Internet DNS at the overall level and to work for the maintenance of a single, interoperable Internet; (b) remain a not for profit corporation, headquartered in the United States of America with offices around the world to meet the needs of a global community; and (c) to operate as a multi-stakeholder, private sector led organization with input from the public, for whose benefit ICANN shall in all events act. ICANN is a private organization and nothing in this Affirmation should be construed as control by any one entity.

9. Recognizing that ICANN will evolve and adapt to fulfill its limited, but important technical mission of coordinating the DNS, ICANN further commits to take the following specific actions together with ongoing commitment reviews specified below:

9.1 Ensuring accountability, transparency and the interests of global Internet users: ICANN commits to maintain and improve robust mechanisms for public input, accountability, and transparency so as to ensure that the outcomes of its decision-making will reflect the public interest and be accountable to all stakeholders by: (a) continually assessing and improving ICANN Board of Directors (Board) governance which shall include an ongoing evaluation of Board performance, the Board selection process, the extent to which Board composition meets ICANN's present and future needs, and the consideration of an appeal mechanism for Board decisions; (b) assessing the role and effectiveness of the GAC and its interaction with the Board and making recommendations for improvement to ensure effective consideration by ICANN of GAC input on the public policy aspects of the technical coordination of the DNS; (c) continually assessing and improving the processes by which ICANN receives public input (including adequate explanation of decisions taken and the rationale thereof); (d) continually assessing the extent to which ICANN's decisions are embraced, supported and accepted by the public and the Internet community; and (e) assessing the policy development process to facilitate enhanced cross community deliberations, and effective and timely policy development. ICANN will organize a review of its execution of the above commitments no less frequently than every three years, with the first such review concluding no later than December 31, 2010. The review will be performed by volunteer community members and the review team will be constituted and published for public comment, and will include the following (or their designated nominees): the Chair of the GAC, the Chair of the Board of ICANN, the Assistant Secretary for Communications and Information of the DOC, representatives of the relevant ICANN Advisory Committees and Supporting Organizations and independent experts. Composition of the review team will be agreed jointly by the Chair of theGAC (in consultation with GAC members) and the Chair of the Board of ICANN. Resulting recommendations of the reviews will be provided to the Board and posted for public comment. The Board will take action within six months of receipt of the recommendations. Each of the foregoing reviews shall consider the extent to which the assessments and actions undertaken by ICANN have been successful in ensuring that ICANN is acting transparently, is accountable for its decision-making, and acts in the public interest....

2014-10-08

Reform ICANN? France or the EU May Be Our Only Hope (video)

If you are happy with ICANN as it is and currently headed--for example, you are a high-stakes stakeholder with vested interests (i.e., a member of the Domain Name Industry--registrar, registry, service provider, etc.), and enjoy having a stacked Board and ICANN organizational structure of "stakeholder groups" which favor, protect, and advance your interests over the wider public interest, and you really like the fact that domain name registrants and governments are excluded from equal voice, representation, and participation in ICANN (as compared to the Domain Name Industry which has largely captured ICANN), and, for example, you believe it is perfectly fine for a new gTLD registry to charge $30,000 per year (or any amount it wishes!) for renewal of the registration of just one domain name, and that there should be no government oversight of ICANN or the registry operators who "own" the gTLDs (generic top-level domains), or what they can arbitrarily and capriciously charge their captive consumers--the domain name registrants--and that domain name registrants should have very few, if any, rights or protections against abusive registrars and registries, then this post is not for you--go celebrate the roll-out of ICANN's new gTLDs auctioned off to the highest-bidders! [Note: GTLD Auctions - ICANNWikiAll proceeds from new gTLDs auctioned off under ICANN's auction model will go to ICANN as "excess funds" that will be redistributed at a later date, in ways that are yet to be determined.--follow the money!]

However, if you are on the outside--e.g., a domain name registrant, a government representative (other than the U.S. government), or a user of the Internet who believes in Internet freedom-- and dislike the idea of selling off the Internet wholesale to commercial interests to be exploited (financially and otherwise) at their sole whim--thereby putting control of who has access to the Internet DNS within the hands of private, unaccountable interests--or if the fact that the global internet DNS, including root zone, is controlled by a corporation formed at the instance of the U.S. government, incorporated under California state law, with no membership, and accountable only to its own self-selected Board of Directors, does not seem right nor consistent with the idea of an open and free internet, with full transparency and accountability, then this post may be of interest to you.

Axelle Lemaire prepares her proposals for the reform of ICANN: [translated from the original French] "[France's] Secretary of State Digital, Axelle Lemaire, wants the European Union to strengthen its role in Internet governance, she recently reaffirmed, and is preparing for action. In December, 2015, [pdf] a meeting organized by the General Assembly of the United Nations will launch a crucial phase in the evolution of Internet governance. Currently, everything is controlled by ICANN, a company incorporated under California law (for nonprofit corporations).... Like others, the Secretary of State Digital Axelle Lemaire wants Internet governance to be more equitable and that Europe contribute more meaningfully and effectively in the management of the Internet. Europe must "quickly formulate concrete proposals" according to a statement sent after the informal meeting of ministers responsible for electronic communications that took place in Milan on October 3. The statement talks of "multi-stakeholder governance, open, truly inclusive, transparent and respectful of human rights and the role of government." The implication is that this does not exist today. Axelle Lemaire wants the Italian Presidency of the European Union to propose concrete measures. Questioned in July on the subject, Axelle Lemaire said then (video below) that she wants reform "of the appointment of members of the Board, the decision process (...) and the consensus rule."... she is well aware of the many obstacles that will stand in the long road to reform ICANN ..."


Trois questions à Axelle Lemaire sur l'ICANN - Three questions for Axelle Lemaire about ICANN
(sorry--in French only--no English subtitles/captioning available)

Vive la France !




2014-09-26

New gTLDs, Name Collisions, How ICANN Broke The Internet (video)

Esther Dyson, founding Chairman (1998 to 2000) of the ICANN Board of Directors, on ICANN's new gTLDs program: "... we are not running out of domains. This is a “way for registries and registrars to make money”... “there are huge trademark issues. I just think it is offensive..." (2011)

The Recorder September 8, 2014: Stephen Coates, Twitter Inc.'s first in-house trademark lawyer: "... My hire also coincided with the opening of the new gTLD (generic top-level domain) space, which created several special problems for Twitter. Q: Can you explain what that is? A: ICANN (Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers), the governing body that runs the domain name and the world of the Internet, decided to open up applications for new gTLDs, with anything to the right of the "dot."... "dot" Microsoft, "dot" App... Twitter didn't file any new applications, so we don't have any new gTLDs, but for defensive reasons and strategic marketing reasons, we are buying a lot of domain names anyway. With those new gTLDs, there have been some challenges, the chief of which for Twitter was "name collision." Q: What is name collision? A: Name collision is a list of 2,000 to 3,000 names and numbers that ICANN has deemed as creating security risks on the Internet, with very technical issues. ICANN is multiplying the number of [top-level domains] out there... so when you have all these new TLDs, what is that going to mean for the Internet? Is it going to break? These are the questions that have been asked for several years and the problem with name collision is that it included a lot of brands, including "Twitter" and "tweet."..."


Top YouTube comment to the video above: "Stunning. This is saying, in a nutshell "Do you use default domain suffixes and short names in your network? Yeah - we're gonna break that, hard. Deal with it." I'm sorry - the way I expect most of us to deal with it is to stub out the new domains at the border DNS servers, at least for our production networks. It is, in fact, what I've already done. So - anyone buying a .prod domain will be invisible to my network, sorry you wasted the money. In the long term, we'll adapt - but it's going to be a decade before a domain in .prod (for example) is actually reachable by many networks. And .corp is going up in May 2015! That's another that's going to be widely broken." 



More Info:
Resources - ICANN: "Name Collision Resources & Information"
https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/name-collision-02aug13-en.pdf
ICANN: "Name Collision Occurrence Management Framework"

See also: domainmondo.com: ".... ClaimICANN New gTLDs: "One of ICANN's key commitments is to promote competition in the domain name market while ensuring Internet security and stability."
Fact: ICANN has damaged the competitive domain name marketplace, and degraded Internet security and stability, by its incompetent and irresponsible flooding of the domain name ecosystem with more than 1000 new gTLDs [see ICANN: "the internet will explode"]."




2014-09-05

ICANN Open Forum at IGF 2014 (video)

IGF 2014, ICANN Open Forum (video, Part A and B, above)

Streamed live, September 4, 2014, from the Internet Governance Forum 2014 meeting at Istanbul, Turkey. ICANN holds an Open Forum at the IGF meeting every year to update participants on the progress that ICANN has made in its various processes since the last IGF. This year’s Open Forum was an opportunity for ICANN to engage in discussions with participants and exchange views with them on a number of developments that are underway such as:
ICANN five-year strategic plan (2016-2020);
ICANN Strategy Panels;
Implementation of Accountability and Transparency Review Team (ATRT) recommendations;
New gTLD program; and
Regional strategies and ongoing globalization efforts.
This was an interactive session with ICANN executives and representatives of its various constituencies engaging in an open dialogue with IGF participants on any ICANN related issues that might interest the audience. Panelists include ICANN President and CEO Fadi Chehadé and ICANN Board of Directors Chairman Stephen D. Crocker.

Today is final day of the Internet Governance Forum, IGF 2014, meeting at Istanbul, Turkey. More coverage at expvc.com.

IGF 2014 Schedule
IGF Webcast Info
IGF YouTube Channel




2014-07-11

All the things ICANN failed to think about before launching new gTLDs

When ICANN decided to do internet domain name public policy based primarily on the competing private, profit-making motives of  registry applicants who could "pay to play" at the rate of $185,000 per new gTLD, with limited input from mostly self-selected so-called multi-stakeholders who collectively form the "junket culture" within ICANN, or as some call it, the "gravy train," as ICANN has done with its new gTLDs domain names program, and in the process completely disregard the public interest -- ignoring objections and warnings from governments, businesses, trademark holders, and others -- ICANN should at least have thought through all of the ramifications, pitfalls, conflicts, and other problems now resulting. Instead, thanks to ICANN, we now have a multi-million-dollar boondoggle and corruption of the internet domain name space. Here's just one example, of many, of the disaster ICANN has created as a result of its new gTLDs process --

https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/roussos-to-crocker-et-al-01jul14-en.pdf (pdf)

240 pages all about just one new gTLD! Multiply that times 1300+ (the total number of new gTLDs to be launched in the "first phase") and you begin to get an idea of the magnitude of chaos and confusion ICANN has irresponsibly unleashed on the global Internet community. There was a better way and there is no excuse nor justification for what ICANN has done. ICANN, its Board of Directors, staff, and all others responsible, should be held accountable. But ICANN is "a monopolistic, hardly accountable private organisation that exercises public authority and power," with no membership and controlled by an "unelected, self-interested, self-legitimised corporate board, answerable, when it really comes down to it, only to itself." The remedy therefore is to replace ICANN.





2014-06-24

Will ICANN Board Disclose New Swiss Legal Structure at ICANN 50?

Will ICANN Be The Next International Organisation In Geneva? | Intellectual Property Watch | 2 March 2014: "During a visit to France last week, Fadi Chehadé, the CEO and president of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), announced that his Board of Directors has given him the green light to further explore reforms of ICANN. Among them is the possibility of creating a parallel ICANN international structure, likely based in Geneva... A resolution of the ICANN Board from 17 February created presidential advisory groups [pdf] established to work on five issues. One advisory group will explore the idea to “Establish complementary parallel international structure to enhance ICANN’s global legitimacy.” Although the document does not refer to Geneva, Chehadé in several talks during his visit in France strongly referred to that possibility.... Interviewed by France Culture radio program “Place de la toile” [program in French] on 22 February, Chehadé explained that he would like to see the creation of a parallel structure for ICANN under the Swiss legal system...." See also Fadi Chehade in this 21 Feb 2014 hearing before the French Senate (video in French).

So will the ICANN Board of Directors disclose to the global multistakeholder community its plans to change (or create a parallel) ICANN legal structure under Swiss law at the ICANN 50 London Meeting as directed in ICANN Board Resolution 2014.02.17.01, adopted February 17, 2014?

"President’s Globalization Advisory Group on: Legal StructureEstablish complimentary parallel international structure to enhance ICANN’s global legitimacy. Consider complementary parallel international structure within scope of ICANN’s mandate. Composition: Sébastien Bachollet; Olga Madruga-Forti; Erika Mann; Gonzalo Navarro; Ray Plzak" (source: ICANN pdf).

Approved Board Resolutions | Special Meeting of the ICANN Board of Directors on February 17, 2014:
Resolution 2014.02.17.01 ".... Whereas, the continued globalization of ICANN must evolve in several ways, including: ... evolving the policy structures to serve and scale to the needs of the global community, and identify opportunities for the future legal structures and IANA globalization.... Whereas, as part of its continued globalization efforts, ICANN should establish certain "President's Globalization Advisory Groups" composed of Board members to address the following areas: Affirmation of Commitments ("AOC"), policy structures, legal structure, root server system, the IANA multistakeholder accountability, and Internet governance.

"Resolved (2014.02.17.01), the Board approves the creation of several President's Globalization Advisory Groups in order to support further ICANN globalization... The President's Globalization Advisory Groups will then make recommendations to the Board, which the Board will report during ICANN 50 London Meeting. These Advisory Groups will deal with the following topics:... policy structures; legal structure;... Internet governance... the President and CEO shall have the authority to change the Advisory Groups and their composition from time to time, without requiring a further resolution.

"RATIONALE FOR RESOLUTION 2014.02.17.01...The continued globalization of ICANN must evolve in several ways, including:... identify opportunities for the future legal structures and IANA globalization. This is an Organizational Administrative Function for which public comment is not required."





2014-05-09

IANA transition, Google Responds to ICANN Draft Proposal

Kudos to Google and its Policy Manager, Sarah Falvey, for Google's thoughtful contribution to ICANN's Draft Proposal to Transition NTIA's Stewardship of the IANA Functions - definitely a "must read" for anyone interested in this ongoing historical process which will affect the IANA functions in the future--including technical administration of the internet, its security, and stability. You can read Google's full statement here (pdf), excerpts follow below.

"....Given the importance of the task, it is critical the following principles are upheld:
● The transition must support and enhance the multistakeholder model;
● The transition must maintain the security, stability, and resiliency of the DNS;
● The transition must meet the expectations of affected parties; and,
● The transition must maintain the openness of the Internet."

".... It is clear that the sunsetting of the U.S. Government’s stewardship role creates two distinct challenges for the community: first, we need to determine a process for the stewardship of these technical functions; and second, we we need to ensure overall oversight or accountability for ICANN’s broader policy-making remit to ensure ICANN remains accountable to the broader community..."

"...convene a full debate on the issue of the IANA functions oversight transition. Let us be clear: we are not necessarily saying ICANN should relinquish its role as the IANA functions operator..." [DomainMondo note: but that possibility is definitely now on the table!]

"The draft scoping document enumerates the role of the ICANN Board of Directors...At a minimum, this proposed plan creates the appearance of a conflict of interest, if not an actual conflict of interest, for the ICANN Board... the Board has a vested interest in ensuring ICANN’s continued relevancy within the Internet governance ecosystem and arguably has an interest in scoping the process to preserve ICANN’s existing role...."

"As noted in the NTIA announcement, determining the parameters of the scope of the IANA transition process is a decision that should be left to the community, and the Board of Directors’ fiduciary duty to ICANN as an institution may cloud its ability to scope the process objectively. Allowing the steering group to perform this task would also free up the Board to work on other pressing matters facing the ICANN community, such as implementation of the ATRT recommendations and broader concerns over organizational accountability and transparency..."





Domain Mondo archive