Domain Mondo's review of the past week and
look ahead [pdf of this post here]:
The
implentation phase of the
IANA Stewardship Transition Plan (including WS1 of Enhancing ICANN Accountability)
is proceeding in accord with the
tentative timeline:
 |
| IANA Stewardship Transition Tentative Timeline |
•
ICANN's new proposed bylaws in connection with the IANA transition and ICANN accountability proposal, have been posted for
public comment through May 21, 2016. Read more at:
ICANN Posts Draft of New Bylaws For Public Comment Until May 21 | DomainMondo.com.
•
On April 19, the
Wall Street Journal published an op-ed by
ICANN Board Chairman Steve Crocker, warning of
terrible consequences if the U.S. government (
NTIA) does not end its oversight of the IANA functions:
Broadening the Oversight of a Free and Open Internet - WSJ: "... If the U.S. does not transition its stewardship role to the global Internet community, then other governments may try to move control to organizations like the United Nations. There is also a risk that some governments may form their own national or regional networks. This disruptive splintering would damage the economy and weaken personal Internet use ..." (emphasis added)
Crocker, like others involved in the IANA transition process from the beginning, including
NTIA's Larry Strickling on March 14, 2014, is being disingenuous by using the phrase
"global internet community" when he
really means ICANN, the California corporation. The IANA stewardship transition is
only about transitioning, or
privatizing, the U.S. government's stewardship role from the U.S. to
ICANN, not the
global Internet community. The
global Internet community is hardly the same as
ICANN or even ICANN's "
community,"
a fact acknowledged by ICANN and the "ICANN community" in setting up the
ground rules for participation in the
CCWG-Accountability (Cross Community Working Group to Enhance ICANN Accountability):
Members & Participants - Enhancing ICANN Accountability: "Anyone interested can volunteer to join the CCWG as a "participant," regardless of whether they are members of the ICANN community." (emphasis added)
Unlike the
global Internet community,
ICANN has largely been
captured by domain name industry and other special interests. As far as Crocker's comment about "splintering" [or
fragmentation] of the internet is concerned, that is
already happening, due, in large part, to
distrust of
ICANN,
its programs, policies, processes, structures, and leadership, by the
global Internet community.
Crocker apparently forgot he was addressing readers of the
Wall Street Journal,
not a gathering of the UN's
Internet Governance Forum or
WSIS. His message would have been much better received had he simply been
honest about the
IANA transition, rather than using the
false narrative of a
transition to the
"global Internet community." In fact, the
Wall Street crowd would have probably warmly embraced the idea of a
transition from
'U.S. government control' to 'control by ICANN,' a California corporation, which functions largely as a
captured agency controlled by
lobbyists and lawyers representing
special interests, known as
'stakeholders' in the institutional
jargon of ICANN, with the
U.S. government retaining veto power over interference by
foreign governments.
But Crocker followed the
script he had been given,
false narratives and
institutional secrets are inculcated in ICANN's sick
organizational culture. Besides being a misleading reference, the phrase
"global Internet community" sounds to
denizens of Wall Street like a rallying cry of the
Trotskyite wing of
#FeelTheBern. The
Wall Street Journal readers'
comments to Crocker's op-ed
(more than 70 at last count), confirm this. While interesting and entertaining to read, particularly if one wants to know what
that part of the
global Internet community--the part that comprises the affluent demographic that subscribes to the
Wall Street Journal--thinks about the
IANA stewardship transition, there is a jarring brutal honesty in the comments for those accustomed to the rarefied air of the "ICANN bubble"
--here are a few excerpts--
This is a typical political sales pitch; it tells us nothing about the features that supposedly will produce the claimed benefits, ignores legitimate concerns and glosses over all problem areas. Mr. Crocker missed his calling as a telemarketer ...
This is a totally misguided transformation. Mr. Crocker's last sentence to "assure that the Internet of tomorrow is as free, open and resilient as the Internet of today" should give us all pause about even contemplating the changes he and others propose. His proposal reminds me of a mentally ill patient, who, after using medication to restore his mental health, goes off his meds because "he is cured". As soon as the Commerce Department steps away, it will be open season on that openness and freedom by some of the darkest elements around the world, both corporate and governmental. The only reason the internet is free, open and resilient is that the US Government stands behind it.
This article does not include a single supported assertion. Speaking on behalf of "the Internet community—along with businesses, civil society and other interest groups," I voice my dissent.
Mr. Crocker's column is a nice example of a buffoon using all the right words (diverse, accountable, community) to blow smoke up our 4th point of contact. When you want a technical activity managed properly, you don't care about diversity - that is for non-technical people looking to grab control of something. Then there are the questions Mr. Crocker doesn't answer: Example: accountable to whom? He never says specifically, just yada yada yada about an international community. Been there; done that. It's called the UN. Letting Russia, China or the UN anywhere near controlling anything about the internet guarantees only censorship. Even the Europe Union, with its silly "right to be forgotten" can't be trusted ...
... I have to ask who elects people to the Board of ICANN? This guy [Crocker] is really an embarrassment, and should be removed forthwith ...
Not exactly the reaction and response Crocker was looking for, I'm sure. I'll leave the rest of the comments for your reading enjoyment. [
Note: if you're like one
member of the ICANN Board of Directors and don't know how to access WSJ articles without a subscription, just click the
WSJ story link on this
Google search results page.]
•
New gTLD? Use It OR Lose It:
New gTLD Program Delegation Deadlines - ICANN:
"... To date, registry agreements are in place for more than 1,230 new generic top-level domains (gTLDs), and more than 950 of these new gTLDs have been delegated into the root zone ... The New gTLD Registry Agreement defines a 12-month period after contract execution during which the registry operator must delegate its TLD. ICANN expects registry operators to honor this commitment, and most do. However, we've recently seen an uptick in registry operators who either haven't met their deadline or aren't on track to do so. There are about 200 TLDs with approaching delegation deadlines between now and the end of August 2016 ... If a registry operator does not meet its delegation deadline, ICANN has the option to terminate the registry agreement, as per Section 4.3(b) of the agreement ..."
•
DotConnectAfrica Trust vs ICANN and ZACR: ICANN's
motion to dismiss scheduled for hearing
April 25, in Los Angeles.
•
Earnings Season schedule this week on Domain Mondo's Earnings Calendar:
- Twitter TWTR April 26
- Apple AAPL April 26
- Facebook FB April 27
- Verisign VRSN April 28, 4:30 p.m. ET
- Neustar NSR April 28
- Amazon AMZN April 28 5pm ET
• This past week's
five most popular posts on
Domain Mondo (# of pageviews Sun-Sat):
Honorable mention:
Jack Bogle, Founder of Vanguard Group, Creator of Index Funds, Interview | DomainMondo.com
New This Week:
Other Reading Recommendations (with a little taste of the article or a little of my own commentary):
- Google’s Remarkably Close Relationship With the Obama White House, in Two Charts | The Intercept: "Google doesn't just lobby the White House for favors, but collaborates with officials, effectively serving as a sort of corporate extension of government operations in the digital era."
- Google site's traffic-acquisition costs (TAC) | Business Insider - Here's Google a/k/a Alphabet's real problem--mobile traffic is increasing, desktop traffic is in decline, Google is having to pay more to companies like Apple to position Google search as the default search application, meaning Google has to pay more and more to maintain its market position. It is having to pay more to buy traffic, and analysts fear this is a "race to the bottom." Meanwhile, Alphabet's own "alpha bets" are all losers, losing $$billions, and for how much longer, analysts and investors are beginning to wonder. See also: Google’s Skunkworks Loses Its Leader to Facebook—and Has Yet to Produce Any Hits | MIT Technology Review and At Google, pressure mounts to find something beyond search | CNET
- How Facebook plans to take over the world | Technology | The Guardian - Personally, I'm with India, 'no, thank you.'
- Why HTC may be the next Motorola of Android | Computerworld: "More than any other [Android smartphone] manufacturer, though, it's [HTC.com] doing a lot of things right -- and it's rapidly becoming the company to watch for anyone who cares about an exceptional Android experience."
- Apple Services Shut Down in China in Startling About-Face | The New York Times - a stark warning to any foreign entity doing business in China--here today, gone tomorrow.
- Buying an Android phone in India is a pain in the ass | Quartz: "... Er, iPhone? 'I hate Apple and their closed ecosystem. I’ll never buy Apple.'... Micromax, the maker of popular [Android] smartphones ... launched 15 phones on one day ... "
- Microsoft, Google agree to stop complaining to regulators about each other | Re/code - Proof of both Microsoft's and Google's mutual 'concerns' about other 'threats'
- Financial Times: ‘We are facing daunting conditions’ | POLITICO: “... Despite its high-value readership, the financial newspaper has not been immune to the painful trends afflicting its general-interest rivals: Print advertising has had another bad start to the year, while the digital news business is also proving to be precarious ..." - Are they just beginning to realize this?
- Why Intel’s Job Cuts May Be Just the Beginning | MIT Technology Review - Even a mighty disruptor is subject to disruption.
- Seeking Alpha: "... Intel, for instance, just announced that it would layoff 12,000 workers, 11% of its entire workforce. It is not the global economy that is blamed but rather the shift to mobile computing. At IBM, there is undeniable truth in the charge, but then how do we explain Apple, who should be the main beneficiary of Intel’s stumble (and IBM’s to some degree), suddenly and sharply cutting back its own production in January?... last week it was reported that Apple intended to maintain its reduced production schedule for the April to June period, as well, citing “sluggish sales”..."
- Now some good news: Acer Press Release | April 21: "Acer today debuts its new Chromebook 14 for Work, the industry’s first Chromebook with 6th Generation Intel® Core™ processors, available with a durable design designed to meet the demanding needs of enterprise, government, small business and institutional users. The Acer Chromebook 14 for Work is powered by a 6th Generation Intel Core processor to provide exceptional performance and long battery life of up to 12 hours ..." [Editor's Note: I have, and use daily, an Acer Chromebook and it is "fantastic" (however, I recommend only models with 4GB or 8GB RAM, 32GB SSD) --I will never go back to Windows (Windows 8, 10, Whatever)--according to data from Gartner, Acer Group (acer.com) is the world’s leading Chromebook brand with over 33 percent market share in Q4 2015. Here's a short YouTube video about the Acer Chromebook 14 for Work which goes on sale in the U.S. and EMEA through authorized Acer resellers in May, 2016.] Compare to Dell's Chromebook for Work.
Have a great week!
-- John Poole, Editor, Domain Mondo
DISCLAIMER
