Showing posts with label Ruby Glen. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ruby Glen. Show all posts

2018-09-02

News Review: 1) ICANN EPDP Struggles; 2) New gTLD .WEB Updates

graphic "News Review" ©2016 DomainMondo.com
Domain Mondo's weekly internet domain news review (NR 2018-09-02) with analysis and opinion: Features •  1) EPDP Struggles, 2) Other ICANN news: a. New gTLD .WEB Updates: Ruby Glen (Donuts) & Afilias, b. DNA & ICANN, and more, 3)a. IDNs--Who Needs Them? b. Afilias Inc., c. Centralnic, and more, 4) ICYMI: a. Facebook & Genocide, b. Egypt, c. Cybercrime & Blockchain, 5) Most Read.

1) ICANN EPDP Struggles
ICANN EPDP Team Meetings this week: Tuesday Sep 4, and Thursday Sep 613:00 UTC, 9am EDT. Non-members of the EPDP Team can follow the EPDP meetings via Adobe Connect: https://participate.icann.org/gnso-epdp-observers, or audio cast via browser or application (e.g.,iTunes).

Editor's note: each EPDP meeting's links to key documents, transcripts, MP3 audio and Adobe Connect recording, will be posted in UPDATES below (as made available by ICANN--note that links to EPDP meetings' transcripts are usually posted on the GNSO calendar within 24 hours). See also EPDP Team wiki, mail list, Temp Spec, and EPDP Charter (pdf).

Sep 6, 2018, EPDP Team Meeting Notes UPDATED:
  • Notes and action items from EPDP Team Meeting 9/6 here.

* * * * * * *
Sep 4, 2018, EPDP Team Meeting Notes UPDATED:
Chat transcript p.5 (pdf)
Editor's note: Little of substance was accomplished at the EPDP team meeting on September 4, 2018. The EPDP team appears to be drowning in dysfunction and lack of direction. EPDP team members have been asking, repeatedly since August 7, for GDPR training which ICANN has yet to provide even though the GDPR was published in May 2016, and training was provided by other California corporations for their respective stakeholders long before the GDPR became enforceable on May 25, 2018.
  • 9/4 Meeting transcript
  • Some "additional considerations and materials" for Tuesday's meeting here.
  • Adobe recording of 9/4 meeting, MP3, chat transcript (pdf).
  • Registries Stakeholder Group (RySG) rationale for removal and onward referral of the contents of Appendix C of the Temp Spec (highlighting added) here (pdf) not approved.
  • Notes and action items here.
  • Slides provided (pdf) were changed for the meeting--copy of 9/4 meeting's slides have not been published by ICANN
* * * * * *
UPDATE: Weekly Reports on the EPDP to GNSO Council hereObjection filed 3 Sep 2018 by Ayden FĂ©rdeline (NCSG): "I am reluctant to make this comment, but I think it is necessary. I do not see any substantial changes between the format of the previous report and this one. I don’t think this communicated anything useful then, and this update does not leave me with an accurate snapshot of the two two-hour long EPDP meetings that I sat through last week. We need something better. If there is a need for a report that will give the community confidence that multistakeholderism is working, fine, let’s use this one. But the Council, if it is to deliver proper oversight over this EPDP, needs a separate report that does not sugarcoat what is really happening within meetings and glosses over the challenges actually being faced. If this same reporting format is used again, I will raise this same objection again." (emphasis added)
* * * * * * *
Highlights from last week's ICANN EPDP Team meetings:

Kurt Pritz (the inept EPDP Team Chair appointed by the GNSO Council): "Thanks very much, Terri. And welcome, everyone. I’m holed up in a hotel room in Melbourne Australia at 11 o’clock at night and there’s a show of funny home videos playing in the background so if – I don't know how it got on the TV but if I laugh now and then that’s why." --Aug 30 transcript p. 2 of 48 (pdf). [Editor's note: turn off the TV during meetings Kurt!]

Kurt Pritz: "And I – gosh, I had one other item I wanted to talk about during this part of the meeting but I forgot what it was." Aug 30 transcript p. 3, supra. [Editor's note: Turn off the TV Kurt!]

Terri Agnew (ICANN staff)"And, Kurt, this is Terri. If you're speaking it looks like your line is still muted." Kurt Pritz: "That’s because it was still muted. So Alex, you sort of alluded to a proposed wording, do you have that? And, you know, it’s late here so I don't know if my coffee’s kicked in." Aug 30 transcript p. 6, supra.

Milton Mueller (NCSG): "Yes, so again I think we are very much going down a rabbit hole here that is completely unnecessary. The problem that we have with 4.4.2 as well as 8 and 9 is that it’s really an access issue; it’s not an ICANN purpose issue. So the problem we have with these so-called legitimate interest lists is that they are trying to incorporate those external third party legitimate interests into a definition of the purpose of ICANN's collection and display of the data which is just a mistake. If we could separate those two things very clearly we could come to an agreement. If you think you're going to accommodate access concerns by defining third party interests as part of ICANN's purpose then we, you know, our stakeholder group is never going to accept that because it is, you know, making the confusion that the data protection authorities told us not to do very explicitly, very clearly and repeatedly that the third party interests, even if they're legitimate and even if they would eventually produce access to the data, should not be confused with ICANN's purpose. And this is what we are persistently doing and that’s our main concern with the many items in Section 4 of the temp spec. Aug 30 transcript p. 7, supra.

Ashley Heineman (GAC, U.S.): "... So I’m going to cautiously agree with Milton, at least in part. I think what may have led us astray here is kind of commingling purpose and interest and so I don't have precise wording at this point but I agree with at least exploring the idea of at least separating out these concepts and exploring perhaps, you know, having them addressed elsewhere, perhaps Appendix A, Section 4. But I’m starting to understand the arguments here and I think fundamentally it’s because we’re confusing two concepts that are quite different. So I’ll stop there ...." Aug 30 transcript p.10, supra.

Alan Woods (RySG): "... I’m not sure that trying to polish up individual sections in this way is getting us – is getting us very far again, reading all the comments from people such as Thomas in the chat. Completely agree, it’s cutting off an awful lot of other aspects and I think it [Temp Spec] just needs a rewrite as opposed to a polish. Aug 30 transcript p.15, supra.

Marc Anderson (RySG): "... I think, you know, the drafting of this [Temp Spec], you know, there was an intent to, you know, the intent here was to, you know, to sort of, you know, bolt on some GDPR compliance to the existing system. You know, and so just sort of taking what's there and redlining it isn't going to – isn't going to be a successful endeavor.Aug 30 transcript p. 17, supra.

Terri Agnew: "Kurt, this is Terri. You may still be muted."
Kurt Pritz: "I know and I was – first it was really funny and second of all, it was really insightful."  Aug 30 transcript p. 17, supra.

Marc Anderson (RySG): "... I don't think that the, you know, the way the conversation is flowing right now where we’re sort of jumping around different sections of the temporary specification  and just sort of debating them ad hoc is moving us towards done. You know, and given how short a timeframe we have, you know, I think we need to focus that up a little more ..." Aug 30 transcript p. 27, supra.

Terri Agnew: "And, Kurt, this is Terri. Please check your mute. Actually, Kurt, it looks like perhaps your audio’s dropped from the Adobe Connect site?"
Kurt Pritz: "Yes, can you hear me now?" Aug 30 transcript p. 27, supra.

Alan Greenberg (ALAC)"I believe 4.4.8 [Temp Spec] tries to conflate too many things and the wording therefore becomes completely untenable." Aug 30 transcript p. 27, supra.

Chat 30 Aug 2018Alan Woods (RYSG): "full rewrite of all the sections is necessary was my point- not polish what is there." 

Editor's note: a "full rewrite of all the sections is necessary" -- that, in a nutshell, is also what is so wrong with the EPDP's project plan and work plan (which impliedly presume the Temp Spec just needs to be fine-tuned or "polished").

For more info and updates on last week's meetings, go to last week's News ReviewNote also:
  • Fear mongers forced to eat shorts over spam swamping claims - GDPR and no Whois hasn't caused catastrophe | theregister.co.uk.

2) Other ICANN News
graphic "ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers"
a. New gTLD .WEB UPDATES
(i) U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Court Room 1, Richard H. Chambers Court of Appeals Building, 125 South Grand Avenue, Pasadena CA 91105:
ORAL ARGUMENT Oct 9, 2018: Case 16-56890: Ruby Glen, LLC v. ICANN (Ruby Glen, LLC [Donuts affiliate] appeals the district court's Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) dismissal of its diversity action against Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, seeking to temporarily enjoin ICANN from conducting an auction [for new gTLD .WEB]. The appellate briefs are here.

(ii) New gTLD .WEB applicant Afilias--Request 18-8: Afilias Domains No. 3 Limited | Board Accountability Mechanisms Committee (BAMCRecommendation on Reconsideration Request 18-8, 28 Aug 2018 reconsideration-18-8-afilias-bamc-recommendation-28aug18-en.pdf [211 KB] excerpt:
See also 2018 Reconsideration Requests – Status Update – 29 August 2018 reconsideration-requests-status-2018-29aug18-en.pdf [pdf, 55.9 KB].

b.  DNA (Domain Name Association) & ICANN:
Editor's note: not to mention that ICANN, by virtue of the above, is violating its own Articles of Incorporation and the provisions of IRC 501(c)(3). Remedies might include filing a complaint with the IRS, or the Attorney General of the State of California for initiation of, or authorization to file, a legal action pursuant to federal (U.S.) and state (California) law for involuntary dissolution of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and NumbersICANN: incompetent, corrupt, unfit.
UPDATE: go here, here, and here for more on the sordid history of ICANN & the DNA.

c. The New ICANN Fellowship Program | ICANN.org: "... Future fellowship cohorts will consist of 45 participants per ICANN meeting, a 25% reduction from years past. Of the 45 slots, seven (7) will go to Fellowship mentors. We will uphold and enforce the rule which states an individual can only serve as a fellow a total of three instances ..."  See also ICANN Pays Senior VP Sally Costerton Secret Contract $$$ | DomainMondo.com.

d. Nothing of import: Minutes (pdf) of ICANN Board Accountability Mechanisms Committee (BAMC) Meeting 02 Aug 2018; and Agenda of BAMC meeting 04 Sep 2018.

e. Internationalized Domain Names | ICANN.orgInternationalized Domain Names (IDNs) enable people around the world to use domain names in local languages and scripts. Editor's note: see the next item below.

3) Names, Domains & Trademarks
graphic "Names, Domains & Trademarks" ©2017 DomainMondo.com
a. IDNs a/k/a Internationalized Domain Names: Who Needs Them? (Other than cyber criminals for homograph attacks) --
Nobody Needs Arabic Domain Names | muscatdaily.com  26 Aug 2018: "The Telecommunications Regulatory Authority (TRA) has been offering Arabic language domain names since 2012, but luckily, it does not seem that anyone in Oman has made the mistake of actually using one ... Almost ten years ago, ICANN, the global authority for regulating domain names, announced that it would allow the registration of top-level internationalised domain names written in local languages and scripts other than the Latin alphabet ... nobody seems to be using them. Contrary to what was argued by the proponents of [IDNs] ... We have had web content written in the Arabic language before Arabic domain names came out, and we continue to do so without using these domain names ...."
Editor's notewe (the global internet community) did not need 1200+ new gTLDs either, but that didn't stop ICANN.

b.  Afilias, which says it is the world’s second largest top-level domain registry operator, announced Aug 30, 2018, that it has
"formally established a new corporate parent entity, Afilias, Inc. of Delaware, USA.  Afilias plc of Ireland is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Afilias, Inc.  Afilias further announced the relocation of its global corporate headquarters to Horsham, PA [a suburb of Philadelphia], the current offices of its operating subsidiary Afilias USA, Inc." 
Why move from Ireland (part of the EU) to the U.S.? 
"Afilias’ two largest customers, Public Interest Registry (the .ORG registry operator) and GoDaddy (the world’s largest domain name registrar), have US headquarters. These trends, coupled with recent favorable US tax changes, make Afilias’ US presence important in maximizing its future growth."  
Afilias is a privately-held legal entity, formed in September, 2000, by a consortium of nineteen ICANN-accredited domain name registrars, including Tucows Inc. Afilias recently replaced Neustar as the registry services provider for Australia's ccTLD .au, and is currently in litigation against Neustar over India's ccTLD .in. Afilias, (see 2)a. above) was the second-highest bidder for new gTLD .WEB and has been contesting the delegation of .WEB to the winning bidder, Nu Dot Co, financed by Verisign which has an agreement with Nu Dot Co for subsequent assignment of .WEB.

c.  Centralnic Group (LON: CNIC) shares reached a new 52-week low during mid-day trading on Thursday, August 23, 2018, hitting a low of GBX 49 ($0.64), and then hit that low again on Aug 30:
LON: CNIC
Centralnic (domain: centralnic.comreportedly is the 11th largest domain name registrar globally by generic top-level domain volume and among the top five new gTLD backend registry service providers supporting over 100 top-level domains (TLDs). Oh, the penny stock delusions of a new gTLDs true believer!
LON: CNIC
d. Who’s Behind the Screencam Extortion Scam? | KrebsOnSecurity.com"The truth is we may never find out who’s responsible ..."

e. WIPO Center informal Q&A concerning the GDPR as it relates to the UDRP: In preparing a UDRP complaint post-GDPR, how can a trademark owner conduct a WhoIs search/access the domain name registrant’s details?--wipo.int.

f. Why are abandoned domain names dangerous? They are low-hanging fruit for attackers, who can use them to access sensitive email or customer data--csoonline.com.

4) ICYMI Internet Domain News 
graphic "ICYMI Internet Domain News" ©2017 DomainMondo.com
a. Facebook, Myanmar and Genocide: "... the most important global case study regarding the power and potential toxicity of social media; you have to look at Facebook’s enabling role in the Rohingya genocide ..."--datatrekresearch.com. See also U.N. calls for Myanmar generals to be tried for genocide, blames Facebook for incitement--reuters.com.

b. Internet Censorship: Egypt's Sisi signs new law tightening government control online--Law imposes hefty fines, up to five years in prison for those who administer websites deemed to harm national interests.--aljazeera.com.

c. Cybercrime & Blockchain: 4 ways in which blockchain technology will address the problem of cybercrime | techbullion.com: "DNS is effective but it is partially centralized. Blockchain can prevent denial of service attacks since it would decentralize the DNS."

5) Most Read Posts this past week on DomainMondo.com: 
graphic "Domain Mondo" ©2017 DomainMondo.com

-- John Poole, Editor, Domain Mondo 

feedback & comments via twitter @DomainMondo


DISCLAIMER

2018-02-11

News Review | ICANN61 & Puerto Crypto, San Juan, Puerto Rico

graphic "News Review" ©2016 DomainMondo.com
Domain Mondo's weekly internet domain news review (NR 2018-02-11) with analysis and opinion: Features • 1) ICANN61 & Puerto Crypto, San Juan, Puerto Rico, 2) ICANN news: new gTLD .WEB CEP Closed and more, 3) Names, Domains & Trademarks: Q4 2017 Verisign $VRSN results, Tucows $TCX reports Feb 14, 4) ICYMI Internet Domain News, 5) Most Read Posts.

UPDATE Puerto Crypto now named Blockchain Unbound.

1) San Juan, Puerto Rico: ICANN61 Mar 10-15 & Puerto Crypto Mar 14-16
 Puerto Crypto | puertocrypto.com
Going to ICANN61 | San Juan 10-15 March 2018? You could also go to Puerto Crypto, 14-16 March 2018, being held at San Juan's finest hotel, the Condado Vanderbilt.Puerto Crypto | puertocrypto.com
See Making a Crypto Utopia in Puerto Rico | NYTimes.com Feb 2, 2018: "... Dozens of entrepreneurs, made newly wealthy by blockchain and cryptocurrencies, are heading en masse to Puerto Rico this winter. They are selling their homes and cars in California and establishing residency on the Caribbean island in hopes of avoiding what they see as onerous state and federal taxes on their growing fortunes, some of which now reach into the billions of dollars ... After Hurricane Maria decimated Puerto Rico’s infrastructure in September and the price of cryptocurrencies began to soar, they saw an opportunity and felt a sense of urgency ... “What’s happened here is a perfect storm,” said Halsey Minor, the founder of the news site CNET, who is moving his new blockchain company — called Videocoin [videocoin.io] — from the Cayman Islands to Puerto Rico this winter ..." [link added]

More info at PuertoCrypto.com. Note that Puerto Rico Governor Ricardo Rossello is scheduled to speak at Puerto Crypto on March 15, 4:00 pm, on "How Puerto Rico Will Embrace Blockchain & Crypto." 
"Puerto Crypto is a conference focused on connecting Puerto Rico with visionary entrepreneurs and investors in the blockchain, crypto currency and ICO vertical. Puerto Crypto is a non-profit event and 100% of profits will be donated to Puerto Rico's hurricane recovery efforts."--PuertoCrypto.com website.
Editor's note: sounds like Puerto Rico is aiming to become a "Silicon Valley" for cryptocurrency and blockchain technologies. I wish them much success, but first a reality check: among Puerto Rico's foremost priorities are rebuilding its electric power capacity, hopefully to 100% clean energy, and "hardening the infrastructure" to be hurricane-resistant, which may require further federal assistance as well as liquidation of the bankrupt power authority (it was already bankrupt before Hurricane Maria), and replaced with a Puerto Rico Authority (PRA) modeled after the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA).  As a U.S. territory, Puerto Ricans are U.S. citizens and free to move to any of the 50 U.S. States, and many have done so, but to encourage economic development on the island, Section 933 of the U.S. Tax Code provides a special exemption from federal income tax for qualified Puerto Rico sourced income. Together with tax breaks granted by the government of Puerto Rico, the island has a reputation as a unique (no need to renounce U.S. citizenship) tax haven for high net worth U.S. citizens who relocate there. At some point, the need for government revenue will have to be addressed, and the crypto buccaneers better have some answers.

See also: Is Puerto Rico а Crypto Tax Paradise? - Expert Take | News | Cointelegraph.com

Update: Puerto Rico Utility Files Urgent Request for $300 Million Loan | WSJ.com Feb 16, 2018: "Power provider says ‘operations are in jeopardy’ and warns of brownouts."

The Condado Vanderbilt is just a short taxi or Uber ride from the Convention Center where ICANN61 is being held:
 ICANN61 (Convention Center) & Puerto Crypto (Condado Vanderbilt), San Juan, PR
 ICANN61 (Convention Center) & Puerto Crypto (Condado Vanderbilt), San Juan, PR
2) ICANN news
graphic "ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers"
a. New gTLD .WEB--CEP and IRP Status Update – 31 January 2018 (pdf) excerpt:
Editor's note: Donuts and its affiliate Ruby Glen now have until Feb 14 to file an IRP--Independent Review Process proceeding.

b. New gTLD .GAY: Second Expert Opinion of Professor William N. Eskridge, Jr., in Response to FTI Consulting, Inc.’s Independent Review of the Community Priority Evaluation Process (pdf).

c. New gTLD strings .CORP, .HOME, and .MAIL identified as high-risk, delegation deferred indefinitely, applicants to receive full refund of their application fees ($185,000 each)--Approved Board Resolutions | Regular Meeting of the ICANN Board | ICANN.org. [Editor's note: too bad no one paid any attention to SAC045 (pdf) issued by the Security and Stability Advisory Committee (SSAC) on November 15, 2010.]

d. SSAC Advice Document SAC074 Scorecard--ICANN.org: 04 Feb 2018 resolutions-implementation-recs-ssac-advice-scorecard-04feb18-en.pdf [49 KB]. [Editor's Note: Role of the Security and Stability Advisory Committee: 12.2 (b) of the ICANN Bylaws found here.]

e. GAC Advice Scorecard - Abu Dhabi CommuniquĂ©: Actions and Updates 04 Feb 2018:
resolutions-abudhabi60-gac-advice-scorecard-04feb18-en.pdf [98.4 KB]

f. GDPR Models/Analyses | Comments | European Commission, European Union | ICANN-Proposed Compliance Models 07 Feb 2018 gdpr-comments-european-commission-union-icann-proposed-compliance-models-07feb18-en.pdf (pdf 59.9 KB)

g. ICANN.org Pre-ICANN61 Policy Open House Thursday, 1 March 2018, 10:00 UTC and 19:00 UTC: The webinar will run in English and will be conducted in Adobe Connect along with a dial-in conference bridge for audio. Recordings of the sessions will be made available here. Register via this form by 26 February 2018. More info here.

h. New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP - newsletter (pdf). See also:

3) Names, Domains & Trademarks
graphic "Names, Domains & Trademarks" ©2017 DomainMondo.com
a. Verisign Q4 2017 resultsrevenue of $296 million for the fourth quarter of 2017, up 3.2 percent from the same quarter in 2016. Verisign reported net income of $103 million and diluted earnings per share (diluted “EPS”) of $0.83 for Q4, .NET registrations continued declining in Q4, but were more than offset by gains made in .COM registrations--more info here.

b. Tucows Inc. (NASDAQ: TCX) (Hover, OpenSRS, eNom) Q4 2017 earnings webcast: Feb 14, 2018, 8:00 am ET.

4) ICYMI Internet Domain News 
graphic "ICYMI Internet Domain News" ©2017 DomainMondo.com
• How New EU Data Privacy Rules May Apply to Your U.S. Business | Taylor English Duma LLP - JDSupra.com: "... The GDPR provides for penalties up to €20 million or 4 percent of global revenue (whichever is higher) for non-compliant handling of EU personal data ..." See also EU data protection law may end up protecting scammers, experts warn | TheGuardian.com.

• Internet Censorship Skyrockets in Russia in 2017, Study Says | TheMoscowTimes.com"Under the "Yarovaya Law," Russian telecom and internet providers will be forced to store all user communication data for 3 years."  See also Report Shows 'Creeping Criminalization' of Russia's Internet | VOAnews.com.

• Cuba protests US internet task force on increasing internet access on the island | abcnews.go.com: The Cuban Foreign Ministry "rejected the goal of manipulating the internet to bring about illegal programs with subversive political ends."

• Who Should Police the Internet? Neo-Nazi Ban Was ‘Really, Really Dangerous,’ Says Cloudflare CEO | Newsweek.com

• Internet giants back Senate effort to reinstate net neutrality rules | TheHill.com

• How to Travel to (and Around) China, From VPNs to T.P. | NYTimes.com

• US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson: TheHill.com reports on the proposed plan to combine the State Department's Office of the Cybersecurity Coordinator and Bureau of Economic Affairs’ Office of International Communications and Information Policy, into a new Bureau for Cyberspace and the Digital Economy.

• Global Internet And Jurisdiction Conference 2018 | conference.internetjurisdiction.net: Feb 26-28, 2018, Ottawa, Canada.

5) Four Most Read posts (# of pageviews Sun-Sat) this past week on DomainMondo.com: 
graphic "Domain Mondo" ©2017 DomainMondo.com
1. News Review | GDPR & ICANN WHOIS: "We're all Europeans now"
2. Tech Review | Robot Revolution: A New Age of Manufacturing (video)
3. Beware Wall Street's Charging Bull: "We Are In A Massive Bull Market"
4. Tesla, Inc. $TSLA Q4 2017 Results, LIVE Webcast, Feb 7, 5:30pm ET 

-- John Poole, Editor, Domain Mondo 

feedback & comments via twitter @DomainMondo


DISCLAIMER

2018-01-07

News Review | Reply Brief: Ruby Glen vs ICANN (new gTLD .WEB)

graphic "News Review" ©2016 DomainMondo.com
Domain Mondo's weekly internet domain news review (NR 2018-01-07) with analysis and opinion: Features •  1) Reply Brief: Ruby Glen (Donuts affiliate) vs ICANN2) ICANN news: GDPR, Gravy Train, Org Chart, CCT-RT, 3) Names, Domains & Trademarks: Verisign $VRSN Q4 2017, UDRP, New gTLDs4) ICYMI Internet Domain News, 5) Most Read Posts.

1) Ruby Glen, LLC [Donuts affiliate] v. ICANN [re: new gTLD .WEB]
Plaintiff's Reply Appellate Brief [PDF, 387 KB] 20 December 2017, full embed below, excerpt (at pp. 31-32 of 34) emphasis added:
"Ruby Glen submits that despite the district court’s prior denial of its motion for limited discovery ... it has discovered additional facts to bolster the claims asserted in the FAC [first amended complaint]. Ruby Glen also has grounds to assert a direct claim for fraudulent inducement by alleging facts demonstrating that ICANN falsely indicating that it would abide by its Bylaws and Articles of Incorporation, as well as the provisions contained in the Guidebook and New gTLD Program Auction Rules in administering the .WEB auction in an effort to fraudulently induce Ruby Glen to submit its application. A similar claim survived summary judgment in the DCA [new gTLD .AFRICA] matter ... See DotConnect Africa Trust v. Internet Corp. for Assigned Names and Numbers ... Ruby Glen deserves the same opportunity .... For the foregoing reasons and those contained in its Opening Brief, Ruby Glen respectfully requests that this Court reverse the district court’s order dismissing Ruby Glen’s First Amended Complaint ... and allow this matter to proceed on the merits." 
Editor's note: briefing is now complete, the next step is oral argument before a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which should occur later this year.

More info:

Reply Brief embedded in full below:


2) ICANN news
graphic "ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers"
a) GDPR: ICYMI--Letter from Andrew Mack, Chair of ICANN Business Constituency to ICANN CEO Göran Marby | ICANN.org 08 Dec 2017:
  • Issue: ICANN Compliance for WHOIS and GDPR. Excerpt mack-to-marby-08dec17-en.pdf (emphasis added): "... During the ICANN60 meetings you read a statement that ICANN Contractual Compliance would be deferring action against any registry or registrar for noncompliance with contractual obligations related to the handling of registration data. ICANN Org subsequently posted the Statement from Contractual Compliance (the “Statement”) We are concerned that this unilateral action makes no reference to ICANN’s published Revised ICANN Procedure For Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Law (the “Procedure”) that implements the applicable consensus policy (Policy) in this situation. While some overtones of the Procedure are present in the Statement, the lack of transparencycommunity involvement, and process for comment and discussion, among many other procedural safeguards of the Procedure, are missing. Missing too are the basic principles of transparency applicable to ICANN operations ..."
See also: Data Protection and Privacy (GDPR) Update – Plans for the New Year | ICANN.org"submit your feedback before 10 January 2018 ... Email your comments and suggestions to gdpr @ icann.org." (more info at links above and below)


b) ICANN Gravy Train: if you're not getting your "travel expenses" paid (hotel, airfare, etc., including even a per diem) to go to ICANN meetings (and parties), you're a chump--ICANN tries to bury and hide who is being "paid off" but the travel $$$ reports (except for ICANN Directors, officers and staff) are here: Travel Report - Constituency Travel  (though you will have to download and then open each report--good luck if you only have mobile phone web access). For commentary and a ranking of the ten biggest "moochers" go to  @EyeOnICANN:
ICANN spends untold $$ millions for each of its meetings (3 per year). For an example of ICANN's wasteful spending:  ICANN a Steward? LOL! This Is How ICANN Wastes Registrants' Money | DomainMondo.com.

c) Overstaffed & Overpaid: ICANN Management Organization Chart 01 Jan 2018 (pdf) [131 KB]

d) CCT Review Team (CCT-RT):  Public Comment Period Extended until Monday 15 January 23:59 UTC – New Sections to Draft Report of Recommendations | ICANN.org"... The new sections seek to reflect results from the "Statistical Analysis of DNS Abuse in gTLDs" Report (see here for more information), and address costs of the New gTLD Program for trademark holders, based on the results from a survey conducted by the International Trademark Association (INTA) (see here [PDF, 1.4 MB] for more information). In addition, the CCT Review Team requests feedback on updates made to its parking and consumer choice related sections ..."

3) Names, Domains & Trademarks
graphic "Names, Domains & Trademarks" ©2017 DomainMondo.com
  • Verisign $VRSN Q4 and full year 2017 earnings call on 8 Feb 20184:30 p.m. EST. 

4) ICYMI Internet Domain News 
graphic "ICYMI Internet Domain News" ©2017 DomainMondo.com

5) Most read posts (# of pageviews Sun-Sat) this past week on DomainMondo.com: 
1. News Review | 12 Questions for 2018: Domains, ISOC, Internet, ICANN
2. Starbucks $SBUX Makes A Super-Sized Bet On China (video)
3. Blackstone's Byron Wien's 10 Surprises for 2018 (video)  
4. Sam Zell: The Importance of Lowering the Corporate Tax Rate (video)
5. Tech Review | The Big Issues Affecting Tech and Global Economy 2018

-- John Poole, Editor, Domain Mondo 

feedback & comments via twitter @DomainMondo


DISCLAIMER

2017-11-08

New gTLD .WEB Appeal by Ruby Glen (Donuts), ICANN's Answering Brief

New gTLD .WEB Litigation Ruby Glen, LLC v. ICANNICANN's Answering Brief filed Oct 30, 2017, in the Ninth Circuit. The appeal was brought by Ruby Glen LLC (Donuts affiliate) from the Final Judgment (pdf) and Order (pdf) dismissing Ruby Glen's First Amended Complaint (FAC) with prejudice, entered by the U.S. District Court at Los Angeles.

Answering Brief excerpt (page 23 of 75):

ICANN's Answering Brief's Conclusion:

ICANN's Answering Brief [pdf, 393 KB] 30 October 2017, full embed below:

See also:
Also note: "How long does it take from the time of the notice of appeal until oral argument? For civil, agency, or bankruptcy appeals, cases are typically scheduled for oral argument 12- 20 months from the notice of appeal date. If briefing isn’t delayed, this is typically approximately 9-12 months from completion of briefing."--The Appellate Lawyer Representatives’ Guide To Practice in the United States Court of Appeals for The Ninth Circuit (June 2017 ed.) (pdf), p. 16 (emphasis added).

Opinion and Analysis by the Editor of Domain Mondo
Donuts (Ruby Glen) has an extremely weak case, which it should have never filed. By appealing, Donuts is setting itself up--and all other registry operators and new gTLD applicants, now, and in the future (under the common law principle of stare decisis)--for a Ninth Circuit decision that will (but for a few narrow exceptions) "close the courthouse door" to all future wannabe gTLD litigants.

Verisign $VRSN is in no hurry to launch .WEB, as there is a pending CID from the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice, and ICANN also has a pending CEP (pdf) with Donuts and Ruby Glen. In the meantime, most other new gTLDs are "dying on the vinein the global market for domain names as "essentially, an unwanted and defective product."  The further away from the stench of the failing new gTLDs that Verisign is able to position .WEB, the more successful .WEB will be once launched. Once launched (and properly marketed), few doubt that Verisign will quickly recoup all of its upfront investment in .WEB  ($135Million+) and will thereafter enjoy years of a recurring cash flow stream well in excess of a hundred million dollars annually. As others have also noted, .WEB is, potentially, the only "must have" new gTLD for developers, investors, speculators, and trademark registrants, alike.

For further background, see on DomainMondo.comNews Review: ICANN Webinars ...  2) Other ICANN news a. New gTLD .WEB Litigation Sep 10, 2017, excerpt:

feedback & comments via twitter @DomainMondo

Domain Mondo archive